Of course, each of us is unique and unique. But there are also such features of the individual who are peculiar to all people without exception.

By 18 years old, a person already has an formed personality. This does not mean that we do not remake our personality - we have only been engaged in our life, but there is something very deep inner and almost unchanged, which remains with us at all times, the fact that we cannot and do not want to change. This is usually called the "center" ("core") personality.

Initially core of personality is an "I Biological, "what is the sign of the biological personality of a person: its own, similar to someone and unlike others and body, own physical and physiological features. Then the kernel is added to this "I Psychological ", behavioral reactions of the baby, its emotional reactions, and then the formation of not just reactions, but behavior: the meaningfulness of the movements of the eyes and the published sounds, the distinguishes between relatives and outsiders, preference first and distrust of the latter, etc.

The formation of the identity core occurs in the process of active human activity to master the values \u200b\u200boffered by society and the education and is carried out by identity. All psychological structures of the individual who perform the function of the identity core are called "I": image I, metaphor of yourself and life, personal beliefs

(Here children's prescriptions and permits) and typical personal roles (ego-state), personal values \u200b\u200band interests, personal positions and views, the personal concept of the meaning of life ...

The strong core of the individual is expressed through the development of personal position, certainty of personal values \u200b\u200band interests, self-confidence and free choice of their actions. The core of the individual usually corresponds to this era, directly associated with the vital activity of society, with all its material and spiritual culture. It is from the identity core that the impulse of opposition to the outside surrounding is. Different researchers see it in different ways:

  • 1) naturally growing positive grain (humanistic approach);
  • 2) the place of inflamed conflict (classical psychoanalysis);
  • 3) the product of self-sustaining (existential approach);
  • 4) what is formed environmental (Beheviorism and Soviet psychology).

Strong core - with strong biological energy or high level Personality development. The tendency of the human personality core is to actualize their potential opportunities.

The scale of human values \u200b\u200bis the rod of his personality. We characterize a person as a person (and not just an individual) depending on what values \u200b\u200bit is focused on and whether the values \u200b\u200bchosen by them are coincided with those that society recognizes among the most important. First of all, these are ethical and religious values: patriotism, justice, altruism, non-violence, etc. They occupy the top of the scales of public values. A person who has the same values \u200b\u200bon the scale of individual values \u200b\u200bon the scale of individual values, we fully call the personality. People do not just touch their needs, but also aware of them, but realizing themselves compare themselves with others. Evaluation itself in comparison with others, first of all standing on one social step, i.e. "The same as they," expresses the desire for self-realization and self-affirmation. The last, considered as motives (conscious intentions), also the essence of the desire for social recognition and approval, aspiration for achieving and success.

The core of the human person, thus consists of a scale of valuables, motivation to achieve self-realization, freedom of choice and will.The core can only be perceived as a solid and inseparable element, on which the person's personality is further being built.

TO peripherals of the person These structures that are almost continuously changing throughout life are: experience and ability; knowledge, skills, skills; Construction systems, personal history; Behavior: character (accentuation), habits and manners (features), social roles, concrete actions and actions. Far peripherals are appearance, health, condition, personality attributes. Developed periphery for personality can be both good luck and the problem.

Pleasant appearance, beautiful health, vigorism physical, cute character, habit to smile - such a periphery is a good personality, helps move forward and implement. If the appearance of unprecedented, health is bad, physical condition is unimportant, constant fatigue and diseases, the character is harmful, then the periphery does not help develop personality, but rather interferes. Most often, this leads to personal violations: neurosis, depressions, psychosomatic diseases (see ch. 6).

The core of the personality is in man that is the source of its own, internal activity and personality. What goes from the inside of man towards or against the expectations of others and life circumstances. The kernel is a source of personality power.

Core and periphery of personality

What does personality refers to the kernel, what to the periphery? Look

The kernel is one or more?

There is no reason to argue that the person has only one personality core. A person may have several of his biological nuclei (congenital traits, claiming him as a person) and several, replacing each other with age and the development of its culture - cultural nuclei. Look

Development of the core of the person

The core of the person and I

The core of the personality is those structures in a person who are the source of their own motives, internal activity and self-independence. On the different stages The personality development of the core may be provided both biological and psychological structures. All psychological structures of the individual who perform the function of the identity core are called "I".

What's in the kernel?

All we know about the kernel, the fact that it is from him the impulse of opposition to an external surrounding. And what kind and content of this impulse, working with different people and noticing different directions, different researchers see it in different ways. Namely, it is:

  • Naturally growing (butter and rogers,)
  • Product of self-approaching (V.Frankel and J. Budjventla)
  • What will form a person around the environment (and Soviet psychology)
  • Place of inflamed conflict (classic)
  • Perverted spirit movement (Christian anthropology,)
  • Congenital grains of different potential, sometimes replaced by the potential of culture of different levels ()

For a psychotherapist, health is the facade. And inside - painful processes under

Personality- This is the deep essence of the soul, which remains with it on both sides of the curtain. We often accept per person energy stamps.Stamps are the result of the learned lessons and the experience gained in the life. They can be positive or negative. Our person's core- This is the culmination of all types of experience that we choose forever include in our energy structure and bring with you through all future incarnations.

Personal core remains with us even when we leave the scope of life experience. This is the basis of who we are actually. Those who communicate with spirits on the other side of the curtain know that, even returning home, they retain their core of the person. Some even have the same sense of humor and others personal qualitieswho were in life.

In the core of the personality, all levels of vibration are included, including the "aromatic signature", or a characteristic smell. Therefore, many feel the smell of the favorite spirits of the past one. He often awakens them from sleep or pursues when they just walk down the street. As our evolution, the sense of smell is exacerbated. (Many people are already talking to me that they can no longer carry odors that have previously felt every day.) This will allow us to communicate at the new level, including it is easier to perceive messages from perfume. "Aromatic signature" will help us also see the true core of the personality of every spirit.

Our identity core is easiest to understand how special aroma of Godstaying in each of us. However, experiences and energy stamps that we get during the lifetime affect our identity core, sometimes changing it during this life.

Leaving life once again, the soul has the opportunity to choose which energy stampsit will include personal cores.Any negative energy

stamps obtained during life can be "released" upon returning home. Since the house is a medium in which there is no positive and negative energy, all stamps, except for those that we consciously decide to leave, automatically dissolve when we carry out the transition.

Our identity core does not only contain all the life lessons we learned through energy matrix;with each learned lesson, it also becomes more defined.When some vibration level is reached, we will never be able to return to the level lower. When the release of energy stamps is released and masters, the vibration of our soul rises to the initial level of vibration "Ohm". When the assimilation of all life lessons is completed, our soul returns home with the maximum expanded personality core. So God can see God, thus achieving the initial goal of the game.

The founder of the classical school of psychoanalysis Sigmund Freud said that there is a core of a human personality: what is irrational and cannot be explained. Moreover, it cannot be truly changed. This is the main biological peculiarity of the human psyche, a peculiar psychophysiological constant.

From the point of view of psychology, all attempts by rational typing of people stop when it comes to the identity core. The core can only be perceived as a solid and inseparable element, on which the person's personality is further being built.

That a person has a subconscious, and it has great importance, Freud said first. Jung not only confirmed this, but also proved that there are certain structures, the types of the structure of the subconscious. And the opening of Jung is that he managed to describe these subconscious structures. We will try to explain from modern positions to explain what the essence of the theory of Charles Gustav Jung.

In the communicative space, there is a person personality interacting with other personalities. From all sorts of functions of the body of the Human, the Jung allocated two blocks: information perception and decision makeup. Imagine a human brain in the form of an item recycling. This item has input and output. At the input, the brain receives information at the output - a ready-made solution.

People perceive the information in different ways. Some - literally and specifically, perfectly remembering the details, facts, numbers, and others - little pay attention to small details, they perceive the world through images, practically do not see specific facts, but see the trends in them. About such people say that they have a sixth sense.

Agree people are also different. Some, solving, are based in their reflections on objective analysis. Others, making a decision, listen to your own heart, to their own and other senses. It's just on the topic of an eternal dispute: what is more important, mind or feeling? Typography gives an answer - each one.

So, Karl Jung found that all people in the method of perception of information can be divided into 2 groups.

"S" - people who perceive only practical, specific information (the one that can be seen, to hear, touch).

"N" - people who perceive the conceptual, non-verbal, "invisible" information.

According to the method of making a decision, Jung allocated the following two groups.

"T" - people, objectively, logically evaluating information and the same decision.

"F" - people, subjectively, ethically evaluating information and similar solutions.

Moreover, a person collecting specific information (s) may make decisions and objectively and subjectively. The same applies to a person taking information on type N. Thus, Jung allocated 4 basic mental functions.


Sensorika - S (from the English. Sensation - Sensing) - the function of the specific perception of the world through the senses.

Intuition - N (from English. "Intumption" - intuitive) - the function of the distracted perception of the world in holistic images and pictures of fantasy.

Logic - T (from Eng. "Thinking" - Thinking, Thinking) - the mental thoughtful function of the human psyche, processing information and decision-making objectively, impartially.

Ethics - F (from Eng. Feeling - Feeling) - the mental function of subjective judgment or evaluation based on involvement in the internal, mental world of people

Functions in each of these pairs are mutually exclusive, i.e. A specific person perceives the information in some way that the most developed, for example, sensoric (S) prevails over intuition (N). And the solutions also takes on the basis of the prevailing evaluation function: either logic (T) or ethics (F).

Then Karl Gustav Jung introduced another 2 parameters of the human psyche: extroversion (E) and introversion (I). Four mental functions received an extrovert or introverted color. Now the personality model has become "volumetric", versatile and finished. This made it possible to allocate eight basic psychotypes.

Extraverts:

ES - Touch Extravert

EN - intuitive extrovert

ET - logical extrovert

EF - Ethical Extravert

Introverts:

IS - sensory introvert

In - intuitive introvert

IT - logical introvert

If - ethical introvert

So what did it do it?

There is an opinion that psychology is not science, because There is no mathematics in it. It is clear that scrupulous measurements in human psyche - This is absurd. But a reliable forecast is necessary - this is the first sign of scientific. In this case, the same universal principle of Pareto helps, which suggests psychologists: in the system (psyche) there must be 20% of the basic criteria, with which it is possible almost exactly (by 80%) to describe its properties (human behavior). World psychology for the twentieth century developed a huge number of human assessment criteria. It was necessary to figure them out in them, to bring into the system - what did the K.Gung did.

Based on its opening, Jung in 1923 actually built a "periodic system of psychotic". In importance, this discovery is comparable to the creation periodic system Mendeleev in chemistry.

Man is not universal - with which one easily cope, it is not able to handle the other.

Man can not learn everything - It can achieve success only in what the ability has.

Man is not ideal - The advantages and disadvantages in a person are a continuation of each other.

Superior or discomfort The relations between two people depends not so much from their personal qualities or external circumstances, as from the degree of compatibility or not compatibility of the inner entities of these people.

What is consciousness?

At first, that in general such consciousness. Through this question, people thought the entire history of mankind, but still can't come to the final decision. We know only some properties, the possibility of consciousness. Consciousness is aware of themselves, his personality, this is a great analyzer of all our feelings, emotions, desires, plans. Consciousness is that we allocate, what makes us feel not subject to objects, but personalities. In other words, consciousness wonderfully detects our fundamental existence. Consciousness is the awareness of our "I", but at the same time there is consciousness great Mystery. Consciousness does not have measurements, forms, no color and smell, taste, it can not be touched, turn in the hands. Despite the fact that we know very little about consciousness, we completely reliably know that we have it.

One of the main issues of humanity is the question of the nature of this very consciousness (soul, "I", Ego). Diametrically opposite glances on this issue have materialism and idealism. From the point of view of materialism, the human consciousness has a brain substrate, the product of matter, the generation of biochemical processes, a special merger of nerve cells. From the point of view of idealism, consciousness is the ego, "I", the spirit, the soul - the intangible, invisible spiritual body is forever existing, not dying energy. The subject is always involved in the acts of consciousness, which actually realizes.

If you are interested in purely religious ideas about the soul, then the religion will not give any evidence of the existence of the soul. The doctrine of the soul is a dogma and is not subject to scientific evidence.

There is absolutely no explanation, and even more so evidence and materialists who believe that they are impartial scientists (although it is far from this).

But what about most people who are far from religion, from philosophy, and from science, too, represents this consciousness, soul, "I"? Let's ask yourself what is your "I"? Since I often ask this question in consultations, I can say how people are usually answered.

Paul, Name, Profession and other role functions

The first thing is that the majority comes to mind: "I am a man", "I am a woman (man)", "I am a businessman (turner, baker)", "I am Tanya (Katya, Alexey)", "I am a wife ( Husband, daughter) "I.T.P. This is, of course, funny answers. Your individual, unique "I" cannot be determined by common concepts. In the light of a huge number of people with the same features, but they are not your "I". Half of them are women (men), but they are also not "I", people with the same professions seem to have their own, and not your "I", the same thing can be said about wives (husbands), people of different professions, social status, nationalities, religion I.T.D. No affiliation to any group will explain to you that presents your individual "I", because consciousness is always personally. I am not quality, quality only belongs to our "I", because the quality of the same person can change, but his "I" will remain unchanged.

Mental and physiological features

Some suggest that their "I" is their reflexes, their behavior, their individual performances and addictions, their psychological peculiarities etc.

In fact, this can not be the core of the person, which is called "I" why? Because over the course of life, behavior and submission and addiction change, and even more so psychological features. It is impossible to say that if earlier these features were different, it was not my "I".

Understanding this, some lead the following argument: "I am my own individual body." This is more interesting. We will analyze this assumption.

Everyone else is school Course Anatomy It is known that the cells of our body gradually updated during the lifetime. Old dying (apoptosis), and new born. Some cells (the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract) are completely updated almost every day, but there are cells that pass their life cycle significantly longer. On average, all the cells of the body are updated every 5 years. If you consider "I" a simple combination of human cells, then it will be absurd. It turns out that if a person lives, for example, 70 years. During this time, at least 10 times, the person will change all the cells in his body (that is, 10 generations). Can this mean that his 70-year-old life lived not one person, and 10 different people? Is it really pretty stupid? We conclude that "I" cannot be a body, because the body is not constantly, but "I" constantly.

This means that "I" cannot be neither cell qualities or a set of them.

But here the specially erudented counteractors lead: "Well, with bones and muscles it is clear, it really can not be" me ", but there are nervous cells! And they are all life alone. Maybe "I" is the sum of nerve cells? "

We reflect on this issue together ...

Is the consciousness of nerve cells?

Materialism is accustomed to lay on the mechanical components of the entire multidimensional world, "harmony to check algebra" (A.S. Pushkin). The most naive delusion of militant materialism against personality is the idea that the personality is a set of biological qualities. However, the combination of impersonal objects, whether they at least atoms, even neurons, cannot give rise to the personality and her kernel - "I".

How can this be the most difficult "I", feeling capable of experiences, love, just the sum of the specific cells of the body together with the flowing biochemical and bioelectric processes? How can these processes form "I" ???

Provided if the nerve cells would have made our "I", then we would lose part of our "I" daily. With each dead cage, with each neuron, "I" would become less and less. With the recovery of cells, it would increase in size.

Scientific research conducted in different countries The world proves that that nervous cells, like all other cells of the human body, are capable of regeneration (recovery). This is what the most serious Biological International Journal of Nature: "Employees of the California Institute of Biological Research. The solka found that fully workable young cells are born in the brain of adult mammals, which operate along with existing neurons. Professor Frederick Gage and his colleagues also came to the conclusion that the brain fabric is faster than all the physically active animals are updated. "1

This confirms the publication in another biological journal - Science: "For two recent years Researchers found that nervous and brain cells are updated, as well as the rest in human organism. The body is able to restore violations related to the nervous path, "says the scientist Helen M. Blon."

Thus, even with a complete change of all (including nervous) cell cells, the "I" of a person remains the same, therefore, it does not belong to the ever-changing material body.

For some reason, in our time, it is so difficult to prove that it was obvious and clear more ancient. The Roman philosopher-neoplatenk fleece wrote in the third century in the third century: "It is absurd to assume that, since none of the parts of life does not possess, then life can be created by their aggregate, .. besides it is absolutely impossible that life makes a jumble of parts and that life The mind spent the fact that the mind is devoid. If someone objected that this is not the case, and in fact the soul form atoms conceded together, that is, indivisible on the part of the Taurus, then it will be refuted by the fact that atoms themselves only lie beyond the other, without forming a living whole, For the unity and joint feeling cannot be obtained from insensitive and not able to combine bodies; And the soul - it feels itself "2.

"I" is the unchanged core of the person, which includes many variables, but itself is not variable.

Skeptic can push the last desperate argument: "Or maybe" I "is the brain?"

Is the consciousness of the product of the brain? What does science say?

A fairy tale about the fact that our consciousness is the activity of the brain, many have heard at school. The idea that the brain is extremely widespread, and there is essentially a person with his "I". Most thinks that it is the brain that perceives information from the surrounding world, processes it and decides how to act in every particular case, think that it is the brain that makes us alive, gives us a personality. And the body is nothing more than a space that provides the activity of the central nervous system.

But this tale is not related to science. The brain is currently deeply studied. Long and well studied chemical composition, brain departments, the links of these departments with human functions. The brain organization of perception, attention, memory, speech is studied. Functional blocks of the brain have been studied. A huge number of clinics and scientific centers Learn the human brain more than a hundred years, for which expensive effective equipment has been developed. But by opening any textbook, monographs, scientific journals According to neurophysiology or neuropsychology, you will not meet the scientific data on the binding of the brain with consciousness.

For people distant from this area, knowledge seems amazing. In fact, nothing surprising in it. Simply no one and never found the binding of the brain and the very center of our personality, our "I". Of course, scientists-materialists always wanted. Thousands of research were conducted, millions of experiments were spent billions of dollars. The efforts of scientists were not in vain. The brain departments were discovered and studied, their connection with physiological processes was established, a lot managed to understand many neurophysiological processes and phenomena, but the most important thing could not be done. Failed to find the place in the brain, which is our "I". It did not even succeed, despite the extremely active work in this direction, to make a serious assumption that the brain may be associated with our consciousness.

Where did the assumption that consciousness is in the brain? One of the first, such an assumption was put forward in the middle of the 18th century the greatest electrophysiologist Dubois-Reonim (1818-1896). According to his worldview, Dubois Ramon was one of the bright representatives of the mechanistic direction. In one of the letters to his friend, he wrote that "in the body there are exclusively physicochemical laws; If with their help, it is not possible to explain everything, it is necessary using physico-mathematical methods, or find a way to act, or to accept that there are new forces of matter in the values \u200b\u200bof the physico-chemical forces "3.

But he did not agree with him who lived at one time with Reimon another outstanding physiologist Karl Friedrich Wilhelm Ludwig (Ludwig, 1816-1895), headed in 1869-1895 a new physiological institute in Leipzig, which became the world's largest international center in the field of experimental physiology. The founder of the scientific school, Ludwig wrote that none of existing theories nervous activity, including the electric theory of the nerve currents of Dubua Reimon, can not say anything about how acts of feelings are becoming possible. Note that this is not even about the most difficult acts of consciousness, but about much simpler sensations. If there is no consciousness, we can't feel anything and feel.

Another largest physiologist of the XIX century - outstanding English neurophysiologist Sir Charles Scott Sherngton, laureate Nobel Prize, I said that if it's not clear how the psyche arises from the activity of the brain, then, naturally, as little clearly, as it can have any impact on the behavior of a living being, which is carried out by the nervous system.

As a result, Dubois-Reonim himself came to this conclusion: "As we know - we do not know and never know. And no matter how you deepen into the debresses of intracerebral neurodynamics, we will not transfer the bridge to the kingdom of consciousness. " Reimon came to the distemper for determinism the conclusion about the impossibility of explaining the consciousness of material causes. He recognized "that here the human mind comes up to the" world riddle ", which he will never be able to" 4.

Professor of Moscow University, Philosopher A.I. The introduced in 1914 formulated the law "Absence of objective features of animation." The meaning of this law is that the role of the psyche in the system of material processes of the regulation of behavior is absolutely elusive and there is no thoughtful bridge between the activity of the brain and the area of \u200b\u200bmental or mental phenomena, including consciousness.

The largest neurophysiology specialists, the laureates of the Nobel Prize David Humebel and Torsten Vessel recognized that in order to be able to assert the brain and consciousness, it was necessary to understand what reads and decodes the information that comes from the senses. Scientists recognized that it is impossible to do this.

The great scientist, Professor MSU Nikolai Kobzev in his monograph showed that neither cells nor the molecule may not be responsible for the processes of thinking and memory.

There is proof of the lack of communication between consciousness and work of the brain, understandable even to people far from science. Here it is.

Suppose that "I" (consciousness) is the result of the brain. As definitely known to neurophysiologists, a person can live even with one hemisphere of the brain. At the same time, he has consciousness. The person who lives only with the right hemisphere of the brain is definitely present "I" (consciousness). Accordingly, it can be concluded that "I" is not in the left, absent, hemisphere. In a person with the only functioning left hemisphere, too, there is a "me", therefore "I" is not in the right of a hemisphere that is missing from of this person. Consciousness remains regardless of which hemisphere is removed. It means that a person has no area of \u200b\u200bthe brain responsible for consciousness or in the left, nor in the right hemisphere of the brain. It is necessary to conclude that the presence of consciousness in humans is not associated with certain areas of the brain.

Maybe the consciousness is divisible and with the loss of part of the brain it does not die, but only damaging? Scientific facts and do not confirm this assumption.

Professor, D.M. War-Yasenetsky describes: "In the young wounded, I opened a huge abscess (about 50 cube. See, pus), which, undoubtedly destroyed the entire left frontal share, and I did not observe any psyche defects after this operation. I can say the same about another patient, operated on about the huge cyst of cerebral shells. With a wide opening of the skull, I am surprised to see that almost the whole right half of it is empty, and all left hemisphere The brain is composed, almost to the inability to distinguish it "6.

In 1940, Dr. Augustin Iurrich made a sensational statement in anthropological society in Sucre (Bolivia). He and Dr. Ortiz have long studied the history of the illness of a 14-year-old boy, a patient from the clinic of Dr. Ortiz. The teenager was there diagnosed with brain tumor. The young man kept consciousness to the death of the sperm, complained only to the headache. When a pathoanatomic autopsy was made after his death, then the doctors were amazed: the whole brain mass turned out to be completely separated from the inner cavity of the cranial box. Big beating captured the cerebellum and part of the brain. It remains completely unclear how the thinking was preserved in a sick boy.

The fact that consciousness exists independently of the brain, confirm the research conducted by the recent Dutch physiologists under the leadership of Pima Wang Lommel. The results of a large-scale experiment were published in the authoritative biological English magazine "The LanCet". "Consciousness exists even after the brain stopped functioning. In other words, the consciousness "lives" in itself, absolutely independently. As for the brain, this is not at all a thinking matter, but an organ, like any other, performing strictly defined functions. It may very well be a thinking matter, even in principle, does not exist, the Head of Research said the famous scientist Pim Van Lommel "7.

Another argument accessible to understanding non-specialists leads Professor V.F. War-Yasenetsky: "In the wars of ants who do not have a brain, intentionally detects, and, consequently, rationality, no different from human" 8. This is really an amazing fact. The ants solve quite complex tasks for survival, building housing, to ensure that feeds, i.e. They have a certain intelligence, but do not have a brain at all. Makes thinking, is not it?

Neurophysiology does not stand still, but is one of the most dynamically developing sciences. On the success of the study of the brain, methods and the scale of studies are studied, the functions of the brain, the composition of the brain is studied, its composition is already developing in more detail. Despite the titanic work on the study of the brain, the world science today is as far from understanding that creativity, thinking, memory and what their connection with the brain itself is.

So, science is precisely established that consciousness is not a product of brain activity.

What is the nature of consciousness?

Come to understand that there is no consciousness inside the body, science makes the natural conclusions about the intangible nature of consciousness.

Academician PK ANOKHIN: "None of the" mental "operations that we attribute the" mind "have still failed to directly associate with some part of the brain. If we, in principle, can not understand exactly how the mental occurs due to the activity of the brain, is it not more logical to think that the mention of the brain is not in its essence, but represents the manifestation of any other - intangible spiritual forces? " nine

At the end of the XX century, the creator quantum mechanicsThe Nobel Prize winner E. Schrödinger wrote that the nature of communication of some physical processes with subjective events (to which consciousness relates) lies "aside from science and outside of human understanding."

The largest modern neurophysiologist, the Nobel Prize winner of J. Eccles developed the idea that on the basis of the analysis of brain activity it is impossible to find out the origin mental phenomena, And this fact can easily be interpreted in the sense that the psyche is not at all the function of the brain. According to Eclza, neither physiology, nor the theory of evolution can shed light on the origin and nature of consciousness, which is absolutely alien to all material processes in the universe. The spiritual world of man and the world of physical reality, including the activity of the brain, is completely independent independent worlds that only interact and to some extent affect each other. He is invas with such major specialists as Charles Leshley (American scientist, director of the laboratory of primates in Orda Park (PC. Florida), who studied the mechanisms of brain work) and Dr. Harvard University Edward Tolman.

With his colleague, the founder of modern neurosurgery Wilder Penfield, who completed over 10,000 operations on the brain, Eccles wrote the book "Mystery of Man" 10. In it, the authors directly declare that "there is no doubt that a person is ruled by something outside his body." "I can experimentally confirm," writes Eccles - that the work of consciousness cannot be explained by the functioning of the brain. Consciousness exists regardless of him from the outside. "

On the deep conviction of eclza, consciousness can not be subject scientific research. In his opinion, the emergence of consciousness, as well as the emergence of life, is the highest religious secret. In his report, the Nobel laureate relied on the conclusions of the book "Personality and Brain", written in conjunction with the American philosopher-sociologist Karl Popper.

Wilder Penfield as a result of many years of studying the activity of the brain also came to the conclusion that "the energy of the mind differs from the energy of the brain neural impulses" 11.

Academician Academy medical Sciences RF, Director Scientific research Institute Brain (RAMS RF), Neurophysiologist with world name D.M. Natalia Petrovna Bekhtereva: "The hypothesis that the person's brain only perceives thoughts from somewhere from the outside, I first heard from the mouth nobel laureate, Professor John Eccks. Of course, then it seemed absurd. But then the studies conducted in our St. Petersburg Brain Research Institute confirmed: We cannot explain the mechanics of the creative process. The brain can generate only the most simple thoughts of type, how to flip pages readable book Or prevent sugar in a glass. BUT creative process - This is a manifestation of completely new quality. As a believer, I admit the participation of the Most High in the management of the mental process "12.

Science comes to the conclusion that the brain is not a source of thought and consciousness, but at most - their relay.

Professor S. Grof says this: "Imagine that you broke the TV and you called the telemetra, which, twisting different handles, set it up. It does not occur to you that all these stations are sitting in this box "13.

Already in 1956, the outstanding largest scholar surgeon, doctor of medical sciences, Professor V.F. War Yarenetsky believed that our brain was not only not connected with consciousness, but even thinking is not capable of independently, since the mental process is put out of its limits. In his book, Valentin Feliksovich claims that "the brain is not an organ of thought, feelings," and that "the spirit stands out beyond the brain, determining his activities, and all our being, when the brain works as a transmitter, taking signals and transmitting them to body bodies" fourteen.

In the same conclusions, English researchers Peter Fenvik came from the London Institute of Psychiatry and Sam of Parking from the Central Clinic of Southampton. They examined patients returned to life after stopping the heart, and found that some of them accurately retell the content of the conversations that the medical staff led until those were able to clinical death. Others gave an accurate description of the events that occurred in this time segment. Sam is a guy claims that the brain, like any other organ of the human body, consists of cells and is not able to think. However, it can work as a device that detects thoughts, i.e. As an antenna, with which it becomes possible to receive a signal from the outside. Scientists suggested that during clinical death actively, regardless of the brain, consciousness uses it as a screen. As a television, which first takes the waves falling into it, and then converts them into sound and image.

If we turn off the radio, this does not mean that the radio station ceases to broadcast. That is, after the death of the physical body, consciousness continues to live.

The fact of continuing the lives of the consciousness after the death of the body confirms Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, director of the human brain, the neurophysiologist with world name N.P. Bekhtereva in his book "Magic brain and labyrinths of life." In addition to the discussion of purely scientific issues, in this book, the author also leads his personal experience in colliding with posthumous phenomena.

Natalia Bekhtereva, talking about a meeting with Bulgarian clairvoyant Wanga Dimitrov, quite definitely speaks about this in one of his interviews: "An example of Vanga with an absolute way convulsed me in the fact that there is a phenomenon of contact with the dead", and another quote from her book: " I can't help but believe what he heard and saw herself. The scientist has no right to reject the facts (if he is a scientist!) Only because they do not fit into the dogma, worldview "12.

The first consistent description of the posthumous life, based on scientific observations, was given by the Swedish scientist and the naturalist Emmanuel Swedenborg. Then this problem was seriously studied by the famous psychiatrist Elizabeth Kübler Ross, no less well-known psychiatrist Raymond Mode, conscientious scientists academicians Oliver Lodzh15,16, William Cruks17, Alfred Wallace, Alexander Butlers, Professor Friedrich Myers18, American Pediatrician Melvin Morz. Among the serious and systematic researchers, the issue of dying should be specified by professors of medicine at the University of Emory and the staffing doctor at the hospital for veterans in the city of Atlanta Dr. Michael Sabah, a systematic study of the psychiatrist Caennet Ring, he studied this problem. Medicine doctor - resuscitator Moritz Rollingz Our contemporary, tanatopsychologist A.A. Nalchagian. He worked a lot on the understanding of this problem from the point of view of physics, the well-known Soviet scientist, the largest specialist in the field of thermodynamic processes, a member of the corresponding of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Belarus Albert Vainik. Significant contribution to the study of the near-the-world experience, the world's famous American psychologist of Czech origin, the founder of the transpersonal school psychology Dr. Stanislav Grof.

The diversity of the accumulated science of facts is indisputably proves that after physical death, each of the now living inherits other reality, while maintaining their consciousness.

Despite the limitedness of our ability to know this reality with the help of material resources, today there are a number of its characteristics obtained using the experiments and observations of scientists exploring this problem.

These characteristics were listed A.V. Mikheev, a researcher at the St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University in his report at the international symposium "Life after death: from faith to know" which was held on April 8-9, 2005 in St. Petersburg:

"one. There is a so-called "thin body", which is the carrier of self-consciousness, memory, emotions and " internal life»Man. This body exists ... After physical death, being at the time of the existence of a physical body by its "parallel component", which ensures the above processes. The physical body is only an intermediary for their manifestation on a physical (earthly) level.

2. The life of the individual does not end with the current earthly death. Survival after death is a natural law for a person.

3. Next reality is divided into a large number of Levels differing in the frequency characteristics of their components.

4. The location of a person during a posthumous transition is determined by its setting to a certain level, which is the total result of his thoughts, feelings and actions in life on Earth. Just as the spectrum of electromagnetic radiation emitted chemical substanceDepends on its composition, just also the posthumous location of a person is determined by the "composite characteristic" of its inner life.

5. The concepts of "paradise and blood pressure" reflect two polarities, possible posthumous states.

6. In addition to such polar states, a number of intermediates take place. The choice of an adequate state is automatically determined by a mentally emotional "pattern", formed by a person in Earth's Eve. That's why negative emotions, violence, striving for destruction and fanaticism, whatever they are justified outwardly, in this regard are extremely disadvantaged for further fate man. This is a firm substantiation for personal responsibility and following ethical principles. "19.

And again about suicide

Most suicides believe that their consciousness after death will cease to exist that it will be peace, rest from life. We got acquainted with the conclusion of world science on what constitutes consciousness and the absence of a connection between it and the brain, as well as that after the death of the body, the person will begin another, the sampling life. Moreover, consciousness retains its qualities, memory, and his foremost life is a natural continuation of earthly life.

So, if here, in the earthly life, the consciousness was struck by some kind of pain, illness, grief, the liberation from the body will not be liberated from this disease. In the sampling life, the fate of the patient consciousness is even more sad, than in the earthly life, because in earthly life we \u200b\u200bcan all or almost change everything - with the participation of your will, the help of other people, new knowledge, changes life situation- In another world there are no such possibilities, and therefore the state of consciousness is more stable.

That is, suicide is the conservation of the painful, unbearable state of his consciousness for an indefinite period. It is possible - forever. And the lack of hope for improving its condition repeatedly increases the painfulness of any torment.

If we really want a rest and pleasant peaceful peace, our consciousness should achieve such a state in the earthly life, then after natural death it will retain it.

The author would like after reading the material you independently tried to find the truth, double-check the data set out in this article, read the appropriate literature from the field of medicine, psychology and neurophysiology. I hope that, having learned about this area more, you will refuse to try suicide or make it only if you are sure that with the help of it you can really get rid of consciousness.