We created this page because Some authoritative information on this issue, unfortunately, very little is dominated by the Internet information from sources of virtually zero authority.

Besides, completely and close, we see what two different topics are mixed here: "General recovery and hardening of the baby" and "Kid's teaching and teaching", and if the first topic is a "patrimony" of children's pediatricians, then the second topic - this is, of course, the "behavior" of coaches, at least understanding that if we talk about the "Training of the baby", then this means that it is, in the end, you really need to teach to swim, and to teach qualitatively, having worked out only the right Swimming skills that are not preventing further learning.

But the main question that worries all parents (with the exception of "zombied", simply believe in the unequivocal "utility") thinking about the beginning of such classes is: "Does there have any risks for the health of the baby? What is more, benefit or harm ? "

Here on all these questions and this page is responsible.

Moreover, she is responsible for all these questions not by our coaching mouths, but by the mouth of scientists who have some meaningful medical authority.

And from their answers is folded, to put it mildly, a rather insane picture, which does not inspire any optimism, because it turns out that risks are there and these risks are too serious so that they can be neglected.

But these are in our opinion, and what will happen to yours - it will be understandable only after you familiarize yourself with the following materials.

Therefore, read thoughtfully and not in a hurry, then calmly digest read and, if possible, recheck the information received here. And only then take some meaningful decision, remembering that your first task, as a parent, is to avoid risks to health your child!

Reuters Health and others about the influence of chlorine vapor on light children up to 2 years

And what do we, by the way, say Western scientists about the influence of chlorine vapors containing reagents on light kids?
- But what they say:
writes in the article " Infant Swimming Tied to Lung Infection, Asthma"...
- Before you can probably not continue, because Already one thing that these words are told as: "Chlorka provokes light infections in kids" and sounds such a terrible word as "asthma" - already speaks of many things ..
Well, in general, if briefly, then the meaning of the article is: in Belgium, scientists, as a result of recent studies, again established themselves in their opinion that the chlorine (more precisely - the compounds that the chlorine gives a compound with natural pollution) contained in the water pools can damage Toddler respiratory tract. It significantly increases the risk of appearance, for example, such a dangerous disease, like bronchiolitis.
Bronchiolitis is a fairly common inflammatory disease of the lower respiratory tract in kids, most often bronchiolitis caused by the respiratory syncytosis virus. Bronchiolitus results in blocking small air pathways in the lungs.
Scientists have established that the pairs of the water contained in the water make the kid's respiratory tract very susceptible and to allergens, and to various respiratory tract infections.
* Of course, first of all speech about closed pools, because There, chlorine concentration in the air is very high, as a rule, even when the chlorine content in water is normal. Therefore, in Soviet times, we, coaches forced to breathe this air through the nature of the work, even the milk for the harmfulness was given every shift because of this, and necessarily!
- For more information, see Reuters Health information in the original on the link given above or, if the link suddenly does not open, now, just in case, the screenshot of this article:
* Initial article in EUROPEAN Respiratory Journal Infant Swimming In Chlorinated Pools and The Risks of Bronchiolitis, Asthma and Allergy"From 2009 (to which Reuters Health refers to the above article) You will find a link, because It is completely (in screenshots), we did not place here because of the large size of this article, as well as additional tables and other materials contained in it and available only on the links from it, deciding to limit ourselves to only one single screenshot of it:
- The article, indeed, is very interesting - therefore, we advise you to familiarize yourself with it, as with the original source, and not be limited to a brief retelling of its meaning from Reuters Health.
By the way, the discussion by the topic by experts is extremely negative impact on the lungs of small children inhaled in the pools of chlorine vapors and a significant increase in the risk of asthma disease, etc. Easy diseases because of this, not such a rarity in the West, unlike the post-Soviet space, where this aspect, for some reason, does not care about anyone (incl. and parents of kids, oddly enough!) - As an example, see at least the doctor's response of the American clinic "Mayo" to the question "Infant Swimming: Do Indoor Pools Increase Asthma Risk?" who shares with us with your opinion on this issue:
Screenshot:
Materials referenced by the doctor:
* Although, of course, we, too, thanks to God, not all doctors are illiterate or "interested", receiving "slips" from each who came (with their "feed") to the pool in the polarity. Here, for example, one of the reports on the forum, from which you can see what we have in the country with both honest and caring doctors, clarifying the realities of the "dark people" and imputed parents, more faithful to specialists (with university education) than Aqua-sectarian propaganda, massively replicated on the Internet by bung-part "interested" (incomprehensible qualifications and incomprehensible competence in this question) and "healing" bye of infrequent fools-sangules:
So, the question of super recovery (kids up to 2 years) from visiting closed pools, as you see, to put it mildly, it turns out quite dubious, because Children, actively moving in the pool, at the same time, inevitably, breathe actively! And what kind of air they inhale, you already understood - the same, for the inhalation of which we were given milk for harmfulness in Soviet power! But the coaches are adult uncle and aunt, by the way, and, by no means, are not kids with the yet developed light and very weak immune system!
So not from here there are such alarming messages from mothers, like what you see below, copied by us from one Crimean Forum?
Yes, and here, in general, positive messages - also not may not be alarmed:
* And the aspect that some kind of kids also inevitably swallow this water, which, almost, it is almost impossible to avoid - we are not even discussing, providing here the word to specialists who can reasonably argue about the consequences of regular infection of the gastrointestinal Tract for kids with this water. But, believe me, from what we read on this topic, definitely implies what harm from this is also very significant!

Returning to the first article

Collapse of theses of Professor Arshavsky A. I.

But this is what the big champion of this idea writes (by the way, said and in the first article) Professor Arshavsky A. I. (on which everyone likes to refer to all supporters of the idea of \u200b\u200b"swim earlier than walking"), for some reason considering that holding with the child The manipulations in which the protective reflexes are triggered (for example, in the form of the I.A. Ashavsky described, "the child begins to move his hands and legs" due to the "state of relative weightlessness" in the water) - it is useful for cut so much that this Physically impended, the child even "needs to be learning" (but the same "the child begins to move his hands and legs" - this is a banal triggering of the reflex! And how can I teach the infants? What are you for nonsense?!):
Let's finish the text more closely:
We, in principle, not against the "systematic swimming of infants in warm water" (if under "bathing", of course, is meant, without carrying out some scientifically not substantiated specific aqua-sectarian manipulations in the water - from the series "We teach crumb to swim "And if protective reflexes do not work as a result of manipulations - for example, as described by I.A.Aarsavsky," the child begins to move his hands and legs "due to the entry into the" state of relative weightlessness ") - we understand, hygiene and, in the future, what -This entertainment for crumbs and, of course, already competent and smooth teaching the baby to the water. And even agree that "water relaxes the muscles of the body and limbs."
OK. But everyone shows such regular relaxation (without personal medical recommendations), as the Arshavsky advises, and how long (in time) it is necessary (if it is necessary to relax at all!) Regularly relax (absolutely different children!) - We do not know.
Do you know?
It must be assumed that there is also no, because such official recommendations, as far as we know, do not have, and every sensible person is quite obvious that all kids are different, but, it means, and the approaches should also vary, at least at least to some extent and to be, of course In any case, only scientifically based!
But why then do nothing they say about it? Or consider it just unimportant? - Unclear:-(
We go further by text:
"What contributes to the state of relative weightlessness, and the child begins to move his hands and legs"
- We agree that it immediately begins to move with hands and legs in "water weightlessness". It just triggers a protective (defensive) reflex.
More about all this "mechanics" to us.
* This is extremely important material, do not alkalize it!
And what is the benefit of that baby, that we are regularly artificial (!) Forced to work this protective (defensive) reflex? Where is the rationale for this utility or, at least, the evidence of its 100% "no harm"?
* According to the largest children's psychiatrist of Professor G.V. Kozlovskaya (with whom you will find out below), the creation of stressful situations is at all "not good" for the psyche of kids and we tend to believe it justification of this thesis. But protective (defensive) reflexes are triggered only in stressful situations and do not work in protective!
So for what reason, it is necessary to prefer the security situation here and, accordingly, not the triggering (defensive) reflexes - the situation of stressful and the triggering of protective (defensive) reflexes?
Where is the rationale for this incredible wildness? - There is no such rationale and can not be! In the utility of triggering of protective (defensive) reflexes, you just need to believe!
* And here is the principled "development" - some believe that it is "protective" (and not "stressful") the situation is vital to a small little man to preserve his mental health, and we tend to believe in the article below, the opinion of the largest psychiatrist professor G.V. Kozlovskaya, speaking to us: " To preserve mental health, a small child should not experience any stress"But, as you can see, there is a direct opposite doctrine:" Set the baby regular stress and "extreme" - then it will be forced to develop will be to somehow survive in extreme conditions (in which it regularly falls with your help), - regularly stimulate it in such a way that it develops more actively».
+ Advanced about the "utility" of stress for CROS - read below in the article of Galina Elton in the chapter "Theory of Stress and Disteres".
Then we see that Professor Arshavsky begins to speak already about "training" (whom the infants simply can not be! - No anything!), Which, besides, it uses in the sense to teach the crumb to the trigger of defensive reflex laid down from nature"!
- Is this Professor Arshavsky, he, in general, in his mind?!
How is it interesting, the response of reflexes can be taught?
And how, in general, can you learn something (teach) newborns?
But as the removal of static loads on the skeletal muscles and stimulation of its dynamic component "can serve as one of the forms of preventing such negative consequences of acceleration as asthenization and premature puberty" - we, to be honest, did not understand. Apparently, just on illiteracy in medical issues. Did you understand? I doubt!
In a good way (if there is no scientifically based methodology for conducting such activities), all this should be somehow explained in detail to us by scientists who are taking advantage of this path and, thus, calling us to participate in this "very weakly scientifically substantiated experiment"(Besides - for your own money):
- and, according to logic, with a mandatory refund to some serious multifactorial research, authoritative scientific papers, recommendations of official medical organizations and recommendations of professional communities of Russian pediatricians and other developed countries of the world - if only this is not a generally accepted and indisputable opinion of the entire global medical The community as a whole, which we, "gray" should simply take on faith as Axoma, and just someone's personal IMHO or a hypothesis.
- Maybe, really, regular finding in water from birth warns premature puberty and is even a "very important additional source of health, but again, questions: for all children without exception? And without any scientifically based methodology? And what exactly (in quality) water? In general, in any or, nevertheless, a certain value here has a degree of chlorinity, and the presence (especially in excessive concentrations!) All sorts of other, not very useful for crumbling impurities?
What kind of concentrations of various substances here should be considered permissible, and which no? Why do we say anything about it again, when it is well known what, in many settlements of the country, the quality of tap water is just a creepy?
Perhaps this is a really "effective event for compensation for physiological immaturity", but again the question arises: it is absolutely recommended for all "physiological immaturity", and the same technique is applied, and the same "dosages" is absolutely For all polls - or, nevertheless, there are some amendments, depending on the specific extent of some particular "physiological immaturity" and many other related factors, which, according to logic, modern medicine simply cannot but take into account?
And why then all these "wonderful" recommendations are not observed by us on the websites of the official and / or most authoritative medical organizations of the leading countries of the world?
As it seems to us, what we have listed are the most primitive questions that everyone should come to the head of the Parent, reading this text of Arshavsky, but even there are no answers and all these recommendations (on the recovery in one scheme of all crumbs) It is painfully reminded by their primitivism, comic advice from the series " Eat carrots, onions and horseradish - you will be like Sophie Loren», « Want to be advanced - this square-nest"I.5, and such a primitivistic approach (in the style of logic" Swimming for all useful "), as it seems to us, just unacceptable (especially from scientists!) When it comes to so delicate matter as newborns!
So - "Citizens, be alert!", And then, we sometimes happen, with the permission to say, "scientists", not even understanding who can already be trained (due to the presence of a sufficient level of intelligence for the appearance of training ability ), And who is still simply impossible (by age)! :-(
Well, okay, God with them, with such "scientists" ...
- Perhaps it will be better to pay more attention to the opinion of the largest children's psychiatrist, doctor of medical sciences, Corresponding Member of the Raen, Head of the Mental Pathology of the Early Age of the Scientific Center for Mental Health Ramna, Professor of the Department of Psychology of the MPGU development, Galina Vasilyevna Kozlovskaya, which, in its interview For AIF, answers the question of whether the early classes with babies contribute to their rapid intellectual development.

Children's psychiatrist Professor Kozlovskaya about "utility" for development

* Here I would like to fix G.V. Kozlovskaya about her expression "The baby knows how to swim", because So it is simply unacceptable because the ability is such a thing that is simply not given from nature - usually it either comes with age or it is necessary to somehow purposefully master that, at a minimum, requires a certain level of intelligence, which, objectively , just not in babies. You can only talk about babies: "The baby is able to swim, i.e., more precisely, not sinking (because of its positive buoyancy) and because of the respiratory delay reflex in him, it is able to turn onto the back (in order to breathe ), helping myself with the movements by the corps and limbs, is able to reflectically turn over the back on the chest and, making (on the shower of breathing) a small amount of reflex movements with limbs (and thus moving forward for some distance), turn over the back to the back to Sigh - that everything is together and there is so-called. "Rescue reflex". " And this ability is laid in all babies without exception from nature and that is why it is the ability, and not the skill that, as a rule, must be mastered.
"How it all (the innate ability of babies is not sinking) takes place with crumbs in practice - see the selection of the video" Toddler swimming techniques and their transition to drift. "
- It is clear that Professor Kozlovskaya or simply agreed (which is unlikely!), Or rather, this is a ignorable correspondent (Tatyana Yakimanova) so I distorted her words (because in meaning - the speech of Galina Vasilyevna leads to the ability, and not about skill), because To be confused in such elementary concepts is simply unacceptable for any educated person, not that for such a famous professor, like Galina Vasilyevna Kozlovskaya!
** Why finding in water (without the bottom) for a baby is an extremely stressful situation, it becomes clear from the story of Professor, Doctor of Psychological Sciences Philip Galina Grigorievna, who explains to us why, when in "water weightlessness", the infant will work protective ( Defensive) reflexes.
- And if the protective reflexes (defensive) are triggered, this means that this situation for crumbs is extremely stressful, because In the protective protective reflexes in crumbs never work, because To do this, "just no reason."
* By the way, the opinion of Professor G.V.Kozlovskaya, to some extent, confirms our personal experience:
When we were engaged in our children, they, of course, were not developed and enshrined the wrong skills (which, however, not at all amazing for coaching children!), But another problem (affected G.V. Kozlovskaya) was clearly observed:
The fact is that the baby, accustomed to the fact that he (without any labor invested) is always the first (because of the early start) and the object of universal admiration (because " after all, the child does the fact that others at his age are not yet!") when it starts to engage in the group of children-Singarians (and they very quickly catch up with him and, therefore, he, for to stay first, it is already necessary to work as well as everyone else) is absolutely not ready to work and fight (like All others in the group) for the title of the first, because he was simply used to "be always the first" simply, without any difficulty invested (exclusively at the expense of the early start) and there is no competition in his competition.
Accordingly, the "freshly coming" children who start with enthusiasm to master the aquatic environment and with joy "granted the granite of science", they are very quickly catching up and distilled him, which already causes explicit irritation and psychological discomfort, which arises in unwillingness to do in general, .to. For the title of the first, he now needs to fight how to fight (and he is not accustomed to this!), And in the role of the second or the third he does not want to be, because He is also used to always be the first, used to what they admire: " Oh, look - he does the fact that others are not doing at his age!".
Accordingly, the classes are already not in joy and, therefore, to walk on them, it is already categorically not wanting :-(
- And try your passages further, if he is not only to learn, but in general, it does not want to go at all :-(
So G.V. Kozlovskaya, pointing at this moment, said the pure truth! - There is such an aspect and we themselves collided with him ...

Are there any other civilizations in the universe, except human? What are the unidentified flying objects actually? And why people began to constantly observe them in the second half of XX century?

The director of the Astronomical Observatory of the Irkutsk State University, Professor IGU, Senior Researcher of the Institute of Solar-Glond Physics and RAS, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Sergey Yazev, answered. With a lecture "UFO and all-all-all: the revolution that we did not notice" he performed at the festival of science "By the way" in Novosibirsk on October 27.

Chronology of the study of UFO

Birth of myth. In 1947, the so-called case in the cascade mountains occurred in the United States, when the American businessman Kenneth Arnold reported that during the flight on his own aircraft saw in the sky incomprehensible objects similar to the "flying saucer".
Study problem. Since 1952, official investigations of naval and air force began in the United States.
Unofficial research In the 1970s, the USSR began in the 1970s, thanks to the efforts of enthusiasts, for example, a popularizer of astronomy and the associate professor of the Moscow Aviation Institute of Felix Siegel.
Petrozavodsk phenomenon. On September 20, 1977, according to mass evidence of eyewitnesses, an object appeared on Petrozavodsk, in shape resembling a jellycan, with luminous, diverting rays. The investigation very soon showed that the object observed in the sky is a missile started at the same time with a military cosmodrome Plesetsk. It was this case for the first time in the press and gave rise to the study of UFOs in the USSR.
Official research In 1978-1991 in the USSR. The project "Grid" was developed, which were engaged in two departments: the Ministry of Defense and the Academy of Sciences. Material observations were conducted throughout the country, including with the help of military personnel and recruits.
Closing problems for professionals. This happened in the 1980s of the last century, but the topic of UFO still excites ordinary people, Ufologs and the media.

- I would like to give a wonderful statement, which is called the razor of Okkam: "You should not increase the number of entities in the excess of the necessary." This is a useful rule that often allows you to deal with complex things, "Sergei Yazyev began the story. - If you have a wallet disappeared, then, of course, you can argue that I was kidnapped by Marciana, or that he was falling apart on individual molecules, but to start looking good in another bag or think about where you left it.

The work of human hands

"Scientists around the world came to the same conclusion: 80% of all observed UFOs are our own missiles," said Professor of Jazes.

The flight of the medium-sized medium-2.1a-2.1a class missile with the Meridian Space Agency from the Plesetsk cosmodrome.

- It would seem how can I confuse a missile with a flying saucer? The fact is that as soon as the rocket rises quite high, we only see the torch of the engine and optical effects: the bright source of light "plays" on the clouds, in the fog, empties rainbow rings, spirals and so on. Moreover, the length of the engine torch at large altitudes is many hundreds of meters and even kilometers.

The most amazing thing is that people often do not occur that the observed phenomena may be related to some kind of cosmodrome. For example, Irkutsk is located in three thousand kilometers from Baikonur, but when the "Union" starts, he passes above us in an eight minutes, and over the Altai at that time there is a third step. When we look at it from the observatory, it is an enchanting spectacle!

In 2009, residents of the Norwegian town Tromsø were stamped by a terrible spectacle: a glowing rotating spiral that flew out due to the mountain. Well, what could you say about it? Of course, these are aliens - no options! In fact, these were the tests of the Russian rocket "Bulaw", which started from a submarine in the Barents Sea.

Tests of the Russian rocket "Bulaw" over the Norwegian city of Tromsø.

In the 70s of the last century, in the Soviet Union, up to 120 satellites with Baikonur cosmodromes and Plesetsk, that is, every three days on the satellite was launched annually. Add to this launches in the USA, China, France, Japan and get 200 more launched along the entire surface of the planet. All this is visible in vast territories, so people constantly saw a large number of strange effects in the sky, not understanding what is happening.

International statistics says that about 10% of all UFOs are cylinders, that is, devices that are lighter than air. If you look at them from afar, you can not identify what is happening here.

There are giant cylinders that rise to a huge height, there are balls-probes, pilot balls, atmospheric observatory. They are wearing the wind weeks - at the height of tens of kilometers, through all borders.

Falling devices for lighting during night teachings are used by the military, and simple citizens love to run Chinese lanterns for any occasion and occasion.

Another 10% UFO is the earth's appliance. In our time, all kinds of drones became very common, the number of which will only grow. So, before talking about Martians, you must first move all the above hypotheses.

The main idea is as follows: an attempt to reduce all unidentified flying objects to one reason is a dead end. Causes a huge amount.

Natural and mental phenomena

"It must be said that there are natural phenomena, well-studied or not very, which sometimes take for something mystical: halo, clouds, northern lights and others," Sergey Jazev continued.

- Now we most often look into the monitor or iPhone and rarely - on the sky, so many natural things seem amazing. People who lived, say, in the XIX century saw the same halo day every other day, because in frosty weather Ice crystals in the air, highlighted, always give optical effects. Physics is described long ago.

Or, for example, during the volcanic activity of ash emissions, the particles of which will be drunk on each other, are accompanied by electrical discharges - this is amazingly beautiful phenomena. In the second half of the 20th century, previously non-known strange electrical phenomena on large altitudes in the atmosphere (up to 100 kilometers) were found, which were called sprites, elves and jets. These are very beautiful glowing figures, which can be seen even with the ISS.

In October 1989, the most powerful series of outbreaks in the sun led to the grand magnetic beams and polar radiances everywhere, even on low latitudes. Our newspapers were full of messages that people saw some red glowing balls in the sky. This is also not very frequent, but quite a natural phenomenon.

UFO is that he is often sin, often both human psyche. There are people who are convinced that this is all true. If in the past century, the people spoke about these devils, demons, houses, houses, then in our time they talk about the aliens - in the textbooks on psychiatry, all this is written.

The image of the aliens, which was once created by the director Stephen Spielberg, turns out to be a standard picture for everyone. Any grandmother from the most distant village or baby identifies this image - this is already a cultural code.

A certain woman who asks about the end of the world and the invasion of the aliens constantly calls us to the observatory. We are interested in: where did you get it from? I watched Ren-TV, she says. Do not look Ren-TV!

You need to talk directly: many UFOs are a product of conscious hoarse. I myself did such things in the student: hung on the fishing cover from the tank for the technique of photos on the background of the clouds, photographed and published on April 1 in the local newspaper. No one would have been able to determine what this fake! And in our time with the capabilities of photoshop and the Internet, it is not a problem at all.

Sergei Yazev noted that the surgery of the UFO observation reports came to the second half of the 20th century, which exactly coincides with the beginning of mass launch of satellites and rockets: in 1947, after the end of World War II, the US military began to test on their landfill exported from defeated Germany German rockets.

Becoming the results of your story, Professor Jazev said:

Despite the fact that science does not deny the possibility of the existence of a reasonable life outside the land, not a single reliable evidence of visiting our planet by the aliens today.

Guys, we put the soul in the site. So
what you open this beauty. Thanks for inspiration and goosebumps.
Join us in Facebook. and In contact with

"Science is interesting, and if you disagree, then go to X ..." - Richard Dokinz, English biologist.

Probably, no one will argue with the fact that science is not only the engine of progress, but also one of the most beautiful and useful types of creativity for humanity. Each scientific research is the process of creation, each scientist is the creator, in its own way to rethinking and changing reality. Like all creative people, scientists know what inspiration is how difficult it can sometimes find and save. But if you find, then we are happy to share with your wisdom with all those who want - and it truly pleases.

On November 10, the day of science is celebrated around the world. To this date website Assembled by the famous quotes of great scientists, which we learned from their work, letters, Nobel speeches and other sources.

Albert Einstein,
one of the most significant physicists of the 20th century, the creator of the special and general theory of relativity, the laureate of the Nobel Prize in Physics (1921).

Theory is when everything is known, but nothing works. Practice is when everything works, but no one knows why. We combine theory and practice: nothing works ... and no one knows why!
We are all geniuses. But if you judge the fish by her ability to climb on a tree, she will live all his life, considering themselves fool.
If you can't explain something to a six-year-old child, you do not understand that.
Only the fool needs in order - the genius dominates chaos.
There are only two ways to live life. The first - as if miracles do not exist. The second - as if there are some wonders around.
The only thing that prevents me from learn is the education received by me.

Leonardo da Vinci,
italian painter, sculptor, architect, scientist, Renaissance Engineer.

Who wants to get rich during the day will be hung over the year.
Work on the work of art can never be completed, and maybe only abandoned.
The enemy revealing your mistakes is more useful for you than a friend who wants to hide them.
Trying once a flight, and your eyes will forever fix in the sky. Once there I have been having every life you are doomed to wander about it.
Where the hope is dying, emptiness arises there.

Land Landau
soviet physicist theoretics, founder of the scientific school, academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Nobel Prize Prize laureate (1962).

The greatest achievement of human genius is that a person can understand things that he is no longer able to imagine.
English need to know! Even the most stupid British know him not bad.
The most terrible sin is to miss it! ... It will come a terrible court, the Lord God will call and ask: "Why didn't you use all the benefits of life? Why did you miss? "
Everyone has enough forces to dignify life worthy. And all these conversations about what is the hard time is now, is a cunning way to justify your inaction, laziness and different dullness. It is necessary to work, and there, you look, and the times will change.

Nikola Tesla,
inventor in the field of electrical engineering and radio engineering, engineer, physicist.

Do you become familiar with the expression "Night heads not jump"? It's a delusion. A person can all.
The effect of even the most tiny creature leads to changes in the entire universe.
Modern scientists think deeply, instead of thinking clearly. To think clearly, you need to have a sound reason, but you can think deeply and being completely crazy.

Niels Bor
danish physicist and philosopher, laureate of the Nobel Prize in Physics (1922).

There are so serious things in the world that you can only talk about them.
The expert is a person who has made all possible mistakes in a very narrow specialty.
Your idea, of course, insane. The whole question is whether it is enough to be faithful.

Peter Kapitsa,
soviet engineer, physicist, academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences, LaureateNobel Prize in Physics (1978).

Freedom of creativity is freedom to make mistakes.
A young man when he is not yet afraid to do nonsense.
Lead - It means not to interfere with good people work.

British neurosurgeon and the author of many articles about Scientific Atheism, Jonathan Paradjassingham, mounted a video in which he collected 50 interviews with recognized thinkers in the field of physics, chemistry, philosophy and psychology. They shared their opinions about faith in God and life after death. Noam Khomsky, Bertrand Russell and Harold Kroto - "Theories and Practices" publish a selection of the most interesting statements about religion.

Peter Atkins
professor of Chemistry in Oxford

"I think theology struggles with phantoms. Theologies invented an amazing thing - this almost self-sufficient discipline, which does not intersect with physical reality. They composed a variety of theories and mental designs, with which for a long time they tried to instruct humanity on the right path. One of these theories is about the divine goal. Theologians argue that there is some predetermination that science is unable to explain. This is a typical theological concept. They do not respect - and therefore underestimate - the power of human intelligence. They constantly repeat this simultaneously a naive and disarming "argument" about the instended pathways of the Lord, which in no case may not be questioned. These are beautiful words, but they are deprived of any meaning. Why is it possible, it is asked, in the world should have its own purpose and its purpose? "

Simon Blackburn
professor of Philosophy in Cambridge

"Oh no, in a religious plan I am a hopeless skeptic. I think all this mythology is a wonderful material for a good comedy, truly human comedy! Science operates with concepts and phenomena from the real world - sensually comprehensible. And theology is trying to penetrate otherwise, in something that is behind or over reality. David Hume said that religion does not work, because such undertakings are simply meaningless. All truly useful ideas relate to the world in which we are. Therefore, it would be better to religionly! "

Stephen Pinker
professor of Psychology in Harvard

"I am a cognitive psychologist, and I adhere to a naturalist approach to the question of the human mind. In other words, the human mind is a consequence of the body's existence, and the brain is the result of evolution. I am sure that there is no need to invent a kind of metaphysical soul in order to explain the work of our mind. Because there are quite provable theories about human nature - to take at least neurobiology or genetics. And if you suddenly want to answer the main questions of being, you can easily do without reference to the esoteric essences and the Divine Start. "

Noam Homski
professor Linguistics in Mit

"I try my best to believe and try to proceed from the principle that has proclaimed at one time Bertrand Russell: you need to stay away from the speculation about life after death and believe only what you can find confirmation or proof. And the only possible exception to this rule - faith in ideals. For example, in equality, freedom and justice. I would even say that this is not a faith at all, it is loyalty. "

Lord Martin Riz
royal astronomer

"Science teaches us that even the most simple things are complex for understanding. And it makes me suspicious to treat anyone who claims that he has a simple theory explaining the nature of all things. That is, I am in some kind of pessimist. I think that the maximum to which we can expect is to explain the device of the surrounding reality through some conditional metaphors and assumptions. Accordingly, I believe that we will never be able to boast an absolute understanding of the universe. Nevertheless, I myself definitely do not belong to the number of those who could make any religious dogma. "

Sir Bertrand Russell
philosopher, laureate of the Nobel Prize in Literature

"I learned Christian dogmas and the story of opposing people of believers and unbelievers. And all the arguments in favor of the existence of God looked so unconfiguring from the point of view of the logic that I concluded: there is no practical benefit in faith in unproverable things. After all, there is a logical error: the statement is either true or no. If it is true - I believe, if not, I do not believe. And if you are unable to prove the truth of approval, then you must refrain from any speculations and judgments on this issue. "

Riccardo Dzhakconi.

"Each irrational belief carries a real threat. Look around - the main reason for problems in society lies in the fact that people act irrationally, indulge their ignorance. I would like to be able to achieve human consciousness using science. Unfortunately, we have not yet managed to achieve this goal. Today we are not more rational than in our time there were ancient Greeks. "

Brian Cox
physicist, researcher in CERN

"We can say that I feel more comfortable thanks to my faith in an unknown. This is the whole point of science, right? Somewhere there are things, billions of phenomena, about which we can not know anything. And the fact that we don't know anything about them, admire me and awakens in me the desire to go there and everything will reason. This is the purpose of science. Therefore, it seems to me that if the idea of \u200b\u200bthe existence of an unknown makes you feel uncertain, then you better do not practice science. I don't need a ready-made answer - more precisely, ready-made answers - all questions. For me, the most important thing is the opportunity to find and formulate them. "

Sir Harold Mrelo
nobel laureate in chemistry

"I am an atheist, and it seems to me that most scientists share my attitude to religion. There are some who believe in God, but still more than 90% of all major researchers are not religious. We use scientific methods in our daily life - I believe that this is my main intellectual task. Not that I did not need some mystical component - I simply do not recognize it. In addition, believers are extremely vulnerable creatures. They are illegible in their convictions, such people can voluntarily take an ancient accuracy fairy tale for a clean coin, about whose reliability do not even have to talk. They bother me, because many of them are influential people, fate of millions depend on their decisions. Are they responsible for their affairs? Doubtful. If they are ready to believe in such non-residents, it arises quite a reasonable question: how far can they go in their frivolous irrationality? Will this whim will not affect my life? "

Leonard Sasskind
professor of theoretical physics in Stanford

"I do not believe that the universe was targeted by a certain absolute. I believe that it appeared due to the same reasons as a person. Of course, everything looked like Darwin, as if the man created the Creator. This is quite a natural thought: only the essence of even greater difficulty is something incomprehensible and perfectly fine - can descriptive such a difficult organism and brain. However, then there was a much more prosaic explanation - a person, as it turned out, appeared as a result of a random mutation that occurred only due to changes in the chemical composition of the atmosphere. Some kinds turned out to be more successful, some - not very, someone survived, someone - no. So, in fairness, a person created another Trinity - randomness, statistics and laws of physics. I think about the same thing you can say about the universe. "

Robert Colman Richardson
laureate of the Nobel Prize in Physics

"I do not believe in some anthropomorphic God, who somehow miraculously created the universe. As for life after death, everything I can say about this: "It would be great!" But I do not have the slightest reason to think that it exists. "

Book of secrets. Incredible obvious on Earth and beyond Vyatkin Arkady Dmitrievich

What do scientists say?

It is known that academic science, despite all its achievements, cannot explain these phenomena, since they relate to other reality, while science is engaged in laws relating exclusively to the physical world.

Despite the fact that the very idea of \u200b\u200bthe plurality of inhabited worlds, as well as the idea of \u200b\u200bmoving, there has been a long time ago, beating in fairy tales, myths and science fiction, for the first time it scientifically substantiated American physicist Hugh Eversett in 1957 in his doctoral dissertation. All worlds, in his opinion, turn out to be embedded one in another, like the Russian nesting, that is, they can be inside us, and not only on remote stars.

This text is a familiarization fragment. From the book of earthquake, tsunami, catastrophe. Prophecies and predictions Author Simonov Vitaly Alexandrovich

Scientists warn ... Currently there are many ways of scientists who warn that in the near future, catastrophic events should be expected related to the increase in the seismic activity of the earth's decrees. Academy of Geological Service of America

From the book of Toltec new millennium by Sanchez Victor

Scientists against esotericists in a wide range of those who have "knowledge of the Indians", the dominant position was held by two obviously opposed each other among the merits of a lot of common. One of them was sociologists, obsessed with such

From the Book of the Myth of Atlantis Author

Scientists appealing to a whole class of figures, involuntarily remember what? Either the name of this bright row of great workers. For the long-standing meetings of the Russian archaeological society, which was opposed Turaev, this wonderful researcher

From the book of the Gateway to the Future (Collection) Author Roerich Nikolai Konstantinovich

From the book the era sign (Collection) Author Roerich Nikolai Konstantinovich

Scientists referring to a whole class of figures involuntarily remember any name from this bright row of great workers. For the long-term meeting of the Russian archaeological society, which was opposed to Turaev, this wonderful researcher

From the book of super-capability of a person Author Mavelutov Ramil

What do medicines and scientists talk about the Indigo children since the end of the 70s of the last century, doctors around the world began to notice that not quite ordinary babies appear on the light. It is believed that newborn children before certain age can not focus

From the book all the secrets of Moscow Author Popov Alexander

Chapter 7. Ghost Scientists

From the book Gate to other worlds author Gardiner Filip

From the book the ghost on the deck Author Shigin Vladimir Vilenovich

From the book, manage your destiny by the author of Murphy Joseph.

12 subconsciously enjoy scientists. Many scientists are well aware of the true significance of the subconscious mind. Edison, Marconi, Kettering, Poincare, Einstein and many others resorted to the help of the subconscious. It provided them with the necessary information and "know-how"

From the book Volume 3. Domology Author Vronsky Sergey Alekseevich

Scientists Strong planets: Mercury, Saturn, Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune. Acted signs: Gemini, Virgo, Scales, Scorpio, Aquarius, Sagittarius, Fish. Acted fields: III, VI, VII, VIII, X, XI, IX, XII. Stellium of these planets. The rest of the horoscope, especially the III field - natural

From the book end of the world was not and will not Author Gusev Anatoly Ivanovich

Scientists look down to artifacts when they prohibit archeology, it looks strange. But it is often forbidden to hide the true history of mankind. Archologists, tell me what to think about the mysterious metal ball with notches having age 2

From the book the road to other worlds author Gardiner Filip

CHAPTER 7 Ancient scientists in their study ancient gates I came across a lot of societies, cults and religions. Studying ancient Schmeria, I learned about the existence of Egregors or Guardian Angels, who, as believed to be the angels of God in the Bible. About them and, theoretically,

From the book of the legend of Asia (Collection) Author Roerich Nikolai Konstantinovich

From the book, skin bonds and UFOs Author Dmitriev Alexey Nikolaevich

Where do scientists look? Arriving throughout the study, we must agree in the ways of knowledge. We will know the direction of movement ... connect the foresight with the real movement. Each discovered part of the unknown will be conquered without surprise, without trembling and even without

From the book of Bhagavad-Gita as it is Author Bhaktivedanta A.Ch. Swami Prabhupada

Scientists of Bhagavat-Gita as it is "more than five million copies of more than three million copies, for more than thirty languages \u200b\u200bof the world, Bhagavad-Gita in translation and comments by His Divine Miliciness A.Ch. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada became a real bestseller.