The total number of participants in the main day of the main period of the exam in 2018 exceeded 327 thousand people, which, as in previous years, amounted to more than half of the total USE participants... Social studies is the most widespread exam passed by the choice of graduates, which led to the extreme heterogeneity of the level of training of the contingent of the exam participants. The demand for exam results for admission to training in a wide range of specialties is due to the fact that the exam includes checking the fundamentals of socio-philosophical, economic, sociological and legal knowledge and provides high requirements to the level of preparation of graduates (even to achieve minimum score presented high level requirements).

In general, the share of participants who did not overcome the minimum score increased in 2018 compared to 2017 and amounted to 17.4% (in 2017 - 13.8%; in 2016 - 17.6%).

The number of 100 points in 2018 increased in comparison with 2017: 198 against 142. The growth in 2018 of the share of 100 points to 0.06% (in 2017 - 0.04%) and high points to 7.4% (in 2017 - 4.5%) may be due to the further spread of the practice of differentiated training of graduates, taking into account their individual level of formation of the system of knowledge and skills, as well as the aforementioned improvement of the assessment system for a number of tasks and the implementation of a system of measures to improve the quality of work of subject commissions of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation ...

More detailed analytical and methodological exam materials 2018 available here.

Our website contains more than 3,800 tasks to prepare for the Unified State Exam in Social Studies in 2018. Overall plan examination work presented below.

PLAN OF THE EXAMINATION WORK OF THE USE IN SOCIETY 2019

Designation of the level of difficulty of the task: B - basic, P - increased, C - high.


Verifiable content items and activities

Difficulty level of the task

Maximum score for completing the task

Estimated time to complete the task (min.)

Exercise 1. Know and understand: the biosocial essence of a person; the main stages and factors of personality socialization; place and role of a person in the system of social relations; patterns of development of society as a complex self-organizing system; trends in the development of society as a whole as a complex dynamic system, as well as the most important social institutions; the main social institutions and processes; the need to regulate social relations, the essence of social norms, mechanisms of legal regulation; features of social and humanitarian knowledge (identification of structural elements using diagrams and tables)
Task 2. Know and understand: the biosocial essence of a person; the main stages and factors of personality socialization; place and role of a person in the system of social relations; patterns of development of society as a complex self-organizing system; trends in the development of society as a whole as a complex dynamic system, as well as the most important social institutions; basic social institutions and processes; the need to regulate social relations, the essence of social norms, mechanisms of legal regulation; features of social and humanitarian knowledge (the choice of a generalizing concept for all other concepts presented in the list)
Task 3. Know and understand: the biosocial essence of a person; the main stages and factors of personality socialization; place and role of a person in the system of social relations; patterns of development of society as a complex self-organizing system; trends in the development of society as a whole as a complex dynamic system, as well as the most important social institutions; basic social institutions and processes; the need to regulate social relations, the essence of social norms, mechanisms of legal regulation; features of social and humanitarian cognition (correlation of species concepts with generic ones)
Task 4.
Task 5.
Task 6.
Task 7. To characterize from a scientific point of view the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as holistic system
Task 8. Analyze up-to-date information about social facilities by identifying their common features and differences; to establish correspondences between the essential features and characteristics of the studied social phenomena and social science terms and concepts
Task 9. Apply socio-economic and humanitarian knowledge in the process of solving cognitive tasks on topical social problems
Task 10. Search for social information presented in various sign systems (figure)
Task 11. To characterize from a scientific point of view the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as an integral system
Task 12. Search for social information presented in various sign systems (table, diagram)
Task 13. To characterize from a scientific point of view the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as an integral system
Task 14. Analyze relevant information about social objects, identifying their common features and differences; to establish correspondences between the essential features and characteristics of the studied social phenomena and social science terms and concepts
Task 15. Apply socio-economic and humanitarian knowledge in the process of solving cognitive tasks on topical social problems
Task 16. To characterize from a scientific point of view the foundations of the constitutional system, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, the constitutional obligations of a citizen of the Russian Federation
Task 17. To characterize from a scientific point of view the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as an integral system
Task 18. Analyze relevant information about social objects, identifying their common features and differences; to establish correspondences between the essential features and characteristics of the studied social phenomena and social science terms and concepts
Task 19. Apply socio-economic and humanitarian knowledge in the process of solving cognitive tasks on topical social problems
Task 20. Systematize, analyze and summarize disordered social information (defining terms and concepts appropriate to the proposed context)
Task 21. Search for social information; to extract from unadapted original texts (legal, popular science, journalistic, etc.) knowledge on given topics; systematize, analyze and summarize disordered social information
Task 22. Search for social information; to extract from unadapted original texts (legal, popular science, journalistic, etc.) knowledge on given topics; systematize, analyze and summarize disordered social information. Explain internal and external relationships (causal and functional) of the studied social objects
Task 23. Explain the internal and external relationships (cause-and-effect and functional) of the studied social objects. Expand the studied theoretical positions and concepts of socio-economic and humanitarian sciences using examples
Task 24. Explain the internal and external relationships (cause-and-effect and functional) of the studied social objects.
Evaluate the actions of subjects of social life, including individuals, groups, organizations, from the point of view of social norms, economic rationality.
Formulate, on the basis of the acquired social science knowledge, one's own judgments and arguments on certain problems
Task 25. To characterize from a scientific point of view the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as an integral system (task to reveal the meaning of a concept, use the concept in a given context)
Task 26. Expand the studied theoretical positions and concepts of socio-economic and humanitarian sciences by examples (task involving the disclosure of theoretical positions by examples)
Task 27. Apply socio-economic and humanitarian knowledge in the process of solving cognitive tasks on topical social problems (task-task)
Task 28. Prepare an abstract, review, abstract, creative work(task for drawing up a report outline on a specific topic)
Task 29. To characterize from a scientific point of view the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as an integral system. Analyze relevant information about social objects, identifying their common features and differences; establish correspondences between the essential features and characteristics of the studied social phenomena and social science terms and concepts. Explain the internal and external relationships (cause-and-effect and functional) of the studied social objects. To reveal the studied theoretical positions and concepts of socio-economic and humanitarian sciences by examples. Evaluate the actions of subjects of social life, including individuals, groups, organizations, from the point of view of social norms, economic rationality. Formulate, on the basis of the acquired social science knowledge, one's own judgments and arguments on certain problems

The correspondence between the minimum primary scores and 2019 minimum test scores. Order on amendments to Appendix No. 1 to the order Federal Service on supervision in the field of education and science. ...

OFFICIAL SCALE 2019

THRESHOLD SCORE
Rosobrnadzor decree established minimal amount points, confirming the mastering by the participants of the exams of the main general education programs average (full) general education in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standard secondary (complete) general education. SOCIAL THRESHOLD: 22 primary points (42 test points).

EXAMINATION FORM
You can download high quality forms by following the link.

WHAT YOU CAN TAKE WITH YOURSELF TO THE EXAM

For this exam, the use of additional equipment and materials is not provided.

Authors of tasks for preparing for the exam: M. Yu. Brandt, O. V. Kishenkova, G. E. Koroleva, E. S. Korolkova, O. A. Kotova, A. Yu. Lazebnikova, T. E. Liskova, E. L. Rutkovskaya, and others .; materials from the site http://ege.yandex.ru.



2018-2019 academic year will be the graduation ceremony for many Russian schoolchildren who are already concerned about the successful passage of the United State Exam and successful admission to a good university.

We will tell you how the examination papers are checked in different subjects, how the scale for converting USE scores into grades works, and what innovations can be expected in 2019.

Principles for evaluating the work of the Unified State Examination in 2019

For several recent years exam system in a number of subjects has undergone significant changes and has been brought to the optimal (according to the organizers) format, which makes it possible to fully assess the amount of knowledge of a graduate in a particular subject.

In 2018-2019, no cardinal changes are expected, and it is safe to say that the same principles will be applied to assessing the work of graduates as in 2017-2018:

  1. automated check of forms;
  2. involvement of experts in checking tasks with detailed answers.

How does a computer evaluate?

The first part of the examination work involves a short answer to the questions posed, which the USE participant must enter in a special answer form.

Important! Before starting the work, be sure to read the rules for filling out the form, since an incorrectly executed work will not pass an automated check.

It is quite difficult to dispute the result of a computer check. If the work was not counted due to the fault of the participant who incorrectly filled out the form, the result is considered unsatisfactory.

How do the experts assess?

In many subjects, in addition to the test part, there are tasks for which it is necessary to give a full detailed answer. Since it is impossible to automate the process of checking such answers, experts are involved in checking - experienced teachers with extensive work experience.

Checking Unified State Exam teacher does not know (and even with a great desire cannot find out) whose work lies before him and in which city (region) it was written. The check is carried out on the basis of uniform assessment criteria developed specifically for each subject. Each work is checked by two experts. If the opinion of the experts coincides, the assessment is put on the form, but if the independent appraisers disagree, then a third expert is involved in the verification, whose opinion will be decisive.

That is why it is important to write legibly and accurately so that there is no ambiguous interpretation of words and phrases.

Primary and test scores

Based on the results of the test, the USE participant is awarded a certain number of primary points, which are then converted into text (points for the entire test). V different subjects a different maximum of primary points is provided, depending on the number of tasks. But after bringing the result according to the corresponding table, the USE participant receives a final test score, which is the official result of his final tests (maximum 100 points).

So, in order to pass the exam, it is enough to collect the established minimum threshold for the primary score:

Minimum points

primary

test

Russian language

Mathematics (profile)

Computer science

Social Studies

Foreign languages

Biology

Geography

Literature

Based on these numbers, you can understand for sure that the exam has been passed. But what is the grade? The online scale of 2018 will help you with this, designed specifically for transferring primary USE scores into test ones, which will also be relevant for the results of 2019. A handy calculator can be found at 4ege.ru.

Announcement of official results

Graduates are always worried about the question - how quickly can you find out what result was obtained upon passing and what the scale will be in 2019 for translating the points scored on the exam into traditional grades.

Teachers often undertake to reassure the students, working out the tasks of the USE tickets immediately after the exam and assessing the quality of the work done by the students and the amount of primary points scored. Official results you need to wait 8-14 days, in accordance with the established regulations for the USE-2019. On average, the organizers approve the following inspection schedules:

  • 3 days to check the work;
  • 5-6 days to process information at the federal level;
  • 1 working day for the approval of the results of the GEC;
  • 3 days for posting results on the network and transferring data to educational institutions.

In the event of unforeseen situations and technical problems, these terms may be revised.

You can find out the owl score:

  • directly at your school;
  • on the check.ege.edu.ru portal;
  • on the website gosuslugi.ru.

Converting scores to grades

Since 2009, the results of the USE are not included in the graduate certificate. Therefore, today there is no official state system for translating the USE result into an assessment on a school 5-point scale. Within the framework of the introductory campaign, it is the test score gained on the exam that is always summed up and taken into account. But, many students are still interested to know how they passed the exam - for 3 or 4, 4 or 5. For this, there is a special table in which the correspondences for each of the 100 points in each of the subjects are detailed.

Russian language

Maths

Computer science

Social Studies

Foreign languages

Biology

Geography

Literature

Using such a table is rather inconvenient. It is much easier to find out how you passed the Russian language, mathematics or history using the online calculator 4ege.ru, which also contains a scale for translating USE points, which is relevant for graduates of 2019.

Having received the result of the exam, it is worth deciding on the university as soon as possible, comparing its capabilities with a real competition for specialties of interest. So, the practice of past years shows that in a number of cases it is difficult to get into the most popular areas in the capital's universities even with high scores, because not only the holders of 100-point USE results will compete for places, but also the winners of the largest Olympiads of the 2018-2019 academic year.

About the exam

dateUnified State Exam
Early period
March 20 (Fri)geography, literature
March 23 (Mon)Russian language
March 27 (Fri)mathematics B, P
March 30 (Wed)foreign languages(excluding the section "Speaking"), biology, physics
April 1 (Wed)
April 3 (Fri)social studies, informatics and ICT
April 6 (Mon)history, chemistry
April 8 (Wed)reserve: geography, chemistry, computer science and ICT, foreign languages ​​(section "Speaking"), history
April 10 (Fri)reserve: foreign languages ​​(except for the section "Speaking"), literature, physics, social studies, biology
April 13 (Mon)reserve: Russian language, mathematics B, P
The main stage
May 25 (Mon)geography, literature, informatics and ICT
May 28 (Thu)Russian language
June 1 (Mon)mathematics B, P
June 4 (Thu)history, physics
June 8 (Mon)social science, chemistry
June 11 (Thu)foreign languages ​​(except for the section "Speaking"), biology
June 15 (Mon)foreign languages ​​(section "Speaking")
June 16 (Tue)foreign languages ​​(section "Speaking")
June 18 (Tue)reserve: history, physics
June 19 (Fri)reserve: geography, literature, informatics and ICT, foreign languages ​​(section "Speaking")
June 20 (Sat)reserve: foreign language (except for the section "Speaking"), biology
June 22 (Mon)reserve: Russian
June 23 (Tue)reserve: social science, chemistry
June 24 (Wed)reserve: history, physics
June 25 (Thu)reserve: mathematics B, P
June 29 (Mon)reserve: in all academic subjects

The total number of participants in the main period of the exam in mathematics profile level in 2018 - more than 391 thousand people. The average test score in 2018 increased in comparison with 2017 by more than 2 test points. The number of exam participants who scored 61 points or more increased over the year from 120.6 thousand to 125.6 thousand.At the same time, the greatest growth was shown by the performance of tasks with a short answer, tasks with a complete solution were generally performed somewhat worse than in 2017 ...

As in previous years, the minimum primary score required to pass the exam was 6 (27 test points). In 2018, 7.48% of exam participants did not score the minimum score, in 2017 - 14.35%, this indicator has almost doubled. The upward trend in results relates to USE results both in the country as a whole and in most regions.

More detailed analytical and methodological materials The Unified State Exam 2018 is available by.

PLAN OF THE EXAMINATION WORK OF THE USE IN MATH 2019

Designation of the level of difficulty of the task: B - basic, P - increased, C - high.

Verifiable content items and activities

Difficulty level of the task

Maximum score for completing the task

Estimated time to complete the task (min.)
basic level / profile level

Exercise 1.
Task 2. Be able to use the acquired knowledge and skills in practice and in everyday life
Task 3.
Task 4.
Task 5.
Task 6. Be able to perform actions with geometric shapes, coordinates and vectors
Task 7.
Task 8. Be able to perform actions with geometric shapes, coordinates and vectors
Task 9. Be able to perform calculations and transformations
Task 10.
Task 11. Be able to build and explore the simplest mathematical models
Task 12. Be able to perform actions with functions
Task 13 (C1). Be able to solve equations and inequalities
Task 14 (C2). Be able to perform actions with geometric shapes, coordinates and vectors
Task 15 (C3). Be able to solve equations and inequalities
Task 16 (C4). Be able to perform actions with geometric shapes, coordinates and vectors
Task 17 (C5). Be able to use the acquired knowledge and skills in practice and everyday life
Task 18 (C6). Be able to solve equations and inequalities
Task 19 (C7). Be able to build and explore the simplest mathematical models

Correspondence between the minimum primary scores and the minimum test scores of 2019. Order on amendments to Appendix No. 1 to the order of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science. ...

OFFICIAL SCALE 2019

THRESHOLD SCORE
The order of Rosobrnadzor established the minimum number of points, confirming the mastering by the participants of examinations of the basic general education programs of secondary (complete) general education in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standard of secondary (complete) general education.
MATH THRESHOLD: 6 primary points (27 test points).

EXAMINATION FORM
You can download high quality forms by

The indication of the volume is conditional; the assessment of the answer depends on its content (with deep knowledge, the examinee cananswer in greater volume, with the ability to accurately formulate your thoughtsthe examinee can give a fairly complete answer in a smaller volume).

If Criterion 1 ("Compliance of the answer to the task") is 0 points, then the task is considered unfulfilled and is not checked further. Byother criteria in the "Protocol for checking answers to tasks" form No. 20 points are given.

If according to Criterion 2 ("Using the text of the work for argumentation ") Is given 0 points, then according to Criterion 3 (" Consistency and compliance with speech norms ") The work is not evaluated, in the" Protocolchecking answers to tasks "form No. 2 according to Criterion 3 is set 0 points.

Criterion Points
1. Compliance of the answer to the task
a) The answer to the question is given and testifies to the understanding of the text of the given fragment / poem 2
b) The answer is substantively correlated with the task at hand, but does not allow judging the understanding of the text of the given fragment / poem 1
b) The answer is not substantively correlated with the task at hand 0

a) analysis of fragments important for the task,

2

b) For argumentation of judgments, the text is used at the levelretelling the work or general reasoning about it content, the author's position is not distorted, AND /

1

v) The judgments are not substantiated by the text of the work, AND / OR the author's position is distorted 1, and / OR two or more errors of fact have been made

0
3. Consistency and compliance with speech norms
a) There are no logical, speech errors 2
1
0
Maximum score 6

Assessment of the performance of tasks 9 and 16, which require writing a detailed answer in the amount of 5-10 sentences

The indication of the volume is conditional, the assessment of the answer depends on its content (if there is deep knowledge, the examinee can answer in a larger volume, with the ability to accurately formulate his thoughts, the examinee can answer quite fully in a smaller volume).

Criteria 1 and 2 ("Comparison of the first selected work with the proposed text" and "Comparison of the second selected work with the proposed text") are the main ones. When assessing, the sequence of examples for comparison is determined by their sequence in the work of the examinee.

If by both criteria 1 and 2 0 points are given, then the task is considered unfulfilled and is not checked further. According to other criteria, 0 points are given in the "Protocol for checking answers to tasks" of form No. 2.

If according to criterion 3 ("Using the text of a work for argumentation") 0 points are given, then according to criterion 4 ("Consistency and observance of speech norms") the work is not evaluated, in the "Protocol for checking answers to tasks" of form No. 2 according to criterion 4 is set 0 points.

Performing the task, the examinee independently selects two works for contextual comparison (it is permissible to refer to another work of the author of the original text). When specifying the author, initials are necessary only to distinguish between namesakes and relatives, if this is essential for an adequate perception of the content of the answer (for example, L.N. Tolstoy and A.K. Tolstoy, V.L. Pushkin and A.S. Pushkin).

Criteria Points
1. Comparison of the first selected work with the proposed text

a) Named work, and its author is indicated, work direction of analysis

2

b), work

convincingly compared with the proposed text in a given direction of analysis,

OR the work is named, and / or its author is indicated, the work is superficial, formally 2 compared with the proposed

1
0
2. Comparison of the second selected work with the proposed text

a) Named work, and its author is indicated, work convincingly compared with the proposed text in a givendirection of analysis

2

b) Only a work is named without an indication of the author or indicatedonly the author without specifying the work, work convincingly compared with the proposed text in a givendirection of analysis, OR the work is named, and / or its author, work is indicated superficially, formally compared with the proposedtext in a given direction of analysis

1

c) The work is not named, and its author is not indicated, and / or the work has not been compared with the proposed text in the given direction of analysis

0

3. Involvement of the text of the work for argumentation


a) works, both texts are involved at the analysis levelfragments important for the task, images, micro themes, details, etc. NS ., author's position of original and selectedworks are not distorted, no actual errors

4

b) For argumentation, the texts of two selected works, but the text of one work is drawn tothe level of analysis of fragments important for the task, images, micro themes, details, etc. etc., and the text of another - at the level of his retelling or general reasoning about the content, author's the position of the original and selected works is not distorted, AND / OR made one mistake of fact

3

v) For argumentation, the texts of two selectedworks at the level of retelling or general reasoning abouttheir content (without analysis of important fragments, images, micro themes, details, etc. n.), author's the position of the original and selected works is not distorted,

OR the text of one selected work is drawn tothe level of analysis of fragments important for the task, images, micro themes, details, etc. NS ., and the text of another selectedworks are not involved, the author's position of the original andselected works are not distorted, AND / OR there were two mistakes of fact

2

d) For argumentation, the text of the only selected work is involved at the level of retelling the work or general reasoning about its content (without analyzing fragments, images, micro themes, details, etc.) that are important for the task, OR the text of one selected work is involved at the level of retelling the work or general reasoning about its content (without analyzing fragments, images, micro themes, details, etc.) that are important for the task, and the text of another selected work is not involved,

AND / OR Three factual errors have been made

1

e) For argumentation of judgments, the text of none of theselected works, AND / OR the author's position of the only oneselected piece, or two selected works, or original and selected(s) works, and / OR four or more errors of fact have been made

0

4. Consistency and compliance with speech norms


a) There are no logical and speech errors

2

b) No more than one error of each type is allowed: logical and / or speech (no more than two errors in total)

1

c) Two or more errors of the same type were made (regardless of the presence / absence of errors of other types)

0
Maximum score 10

2 A formal comparison is when the examinee is limited to repetition of words from the task formulation to indicate the aspect of the comparison.

Evaluation of the performance of tasks 17.1-17.4 requiring writing a detailed reasoned answer in the genre of an essay of at least 200 words

Among the five criteria by which the essay is evaluated, the first criterion (content aspect) is the main one. If, when checking the work, the expert gives 0 points according to the first criterion, the task of part 2 is considered unfulfilled and is not checked further. According to other criteria, 0 points are given in the "Protocol for checking detailed answers".

When assessing the performance of tasks of the 2 the volume should be taken into accountwritten composition. The examinees are recommended to have a volume of at least 200 words. If the essay contains less than 150 words ( the word count includes all the words , including service), then such work is considered uncompleted

and is estimated at 0 points *.

When the volume of the essay is from 150 to 200 words, the limit is errors for each point level does not change.

If in the wording of the topic of an essay on poetry there is an indication reveal it using at least three works as an example(poems, lyric poems), then when evaluating such an essay according to the criterion 2 the number of attracted lyric works is taken into account: at using only two works, the score cannot be higher than two points, when attracting one work, the score cannot be higher one point.

Column 20 of the protocol shall contain the number of the alternative.

1. Compliance of the essay with the topic and its disclosure
Points
a) The essay is written on a given topic, the topic is disclosed deeply, multilaterally 3
b) The essay is written on a given topic, the topic is disclosed superficially, one-sided 2
c) The essay is written on a given topic, the topic is disclosed superficially, one-sided 1
d) Topic not disclosed 0

2. Involvement of the text of the work for argumentation


a) For argumentation, the text is involved at the level of analysis of importantto complete the assignment of fragments, images, micro themes, details, etc. NS ., the author's position is not distorted,no actual errors

3
(without analyzing important for disclosurecomposing themes, images, micro themes, details, etc. NS .), OR the reasoning is replaced by a retelling of the text,the author's position is not distorted, AND / OR three mistakes of fact have been made 1

c) Judgments are not supported by the text of the work (s), OR four or more factual errors were made in argumentation (with any level of involvement of the text of the work (s))

0
3. Reliance on theoretical and literary concepts

a) Theoretical and literary concepts are included in the essay and are used to analyze the text of the work (s) in order to reveal the topic of the essay, there are no errors in the use of concepts

2

b) Theoretical and literary concepts are included in the essay, but are not used to analyze the text of the work (s), AND / OR one mistake was made in the use of the concepts

1
c) Theoretical and literary concepts are not included in the essay, or more than one mistake was made in the use of concepts 0
4. Compositional integrity and consistency

And his semantic parts are logically connected, there are no semantic parts insidesequence violations and unreasonable repetitions

3

b) The composition is characterized by compositional integrity,

1

v) The compositional intention is not traced in the essay; gross violations of the sequence of parts statements, significantly complicating the understanding of the meaning essays

0
5. Compliance with speech norms
a) There are no speech errors, or one speech error was made 3
b) Two or three speech errors were made 2
c) Four speech errors were made 1
d) Five or more are allowed speech errors 0
Maximum score 14

* The rules for counting words are the same as rules of the exam in Russian: “When counting words, both independent and service parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “all the same” - one word, “all the same” - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account in the calculation (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words).

dateUnified State Exam
Early period
March 20 (Fri)geography, literature
March 23 (Mon)Russian language
March 27 (Fri)mathematics B, P
March 30 (Wed)foreign languages ​​(except for the section "Speaking"), biology, physics
April 1 (Wed)
April 3 (Fri)social studies, informatics and ICT
April 6 (Mon)history, chemistry
April 8 (Wed)reserve: geography, chemistry, computer science and ICT, foreign languages ​​(section "Speaking"), history
April 10 (Fri)reserve: foreign languages ​​(except for the section "Speaking"), literature, physics, social studies, biology
April 13 (Mon)reserve: Russian language, mathematics B, P
The main stage
May 25 (Mon)geography, literature, informatics and ICT
May 28 (Thu)Russian language
June 1 (Mon)mathematics B, P
June 4 (Thu)history, physics
June 8 (Mon)social science, chemistry
June 11 (Thu)foreign languages ​​(except for the section "Speaking"), biology
June 15 (Mon)foreign languages ​​(section "Speaking")
June 16 (Tue)foreign languages ​​(section "Speaking")
June 18 (Tue)reserve: history, physics
June 19 (Fri)reserve: geography, literature, informatics and ICT, foreign languages ​​(section "Speaking")
June 20 (Sat)reserve: foreign language (except for the section "Speaking"), biology
June 22 (Mon)reserve: Russian
June 23 (Tue)reserve: social science, chemistry
June 24 (Wed)reserve: history, physics
June 25 (Thu)reserve: mathematics B, P
June 29 (Mon)reserve: in all academic subjects

The number of participants in the Unified State Exam in Physics in 2018 (main day) was 150,650 people, including 99.1% of this year's graduates. The number of exam participants is comparable to the previous year (155,281 people), but lower than the number in 2016 (167,472 people). In percentage terms, the number of USE participants in physics was 23% of the total number of graduates, which is slightly lower than last year. A slight decrease in the number of those taking the exam in physics may be due to an increase in universities accepting entrance test computer science.

The largest number of participants in the Unified State Exam in Physics is noted in Moscow (10 668), the Moscow Region (6546), St. Petersburg (5652), the Republic of Bashkortostan (5271) and Krasnodar Territory (5060).

The average USE score in physics in 2018 was 53.22, which is comparable to last year's indicator (53.16 test points). The maximum test score was scored by 269 exam participants from 44 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, in the previous year there were 278 people with 100 points. The minimum USE score in physics in 2018, as in 2017, was 36 tb., But in the primary points this was 11 points, compared with 9 primary points in the previous year. The share of exam participants who did not exceed the minimum score in 2018 was 5.9%, which is slightly higher than those who did not reach the minimum score in 2017 (3.79%).

In comparison with the two previous years, the share of poorly trained participants has slightly increased (21-40 tb.). The share of high-scorers (61-100 tb) increased, reaching the maximum values ​​in three years. This allows us to speak of an increase in differentiation in the training of graduates and an increase in the quality of training of students studying a specialized course in physics.

In 2018, the share of exam participants who scored 81-100 points was 5.61%, which is higher than in 2017 (4.94%). For the USE in physics, the range from 61 to 100 test points is significant, which demonstrates the readiness of graduates to successfully continue their education in universities. This year, this group of graduates has increased in comparison with the previous year and amounted to 24.22%.

More detailed analytical and methodological materials of the USE 2018 are available here.

Our website contains about 3,000 tasks to prepare for the exam in physics in 2019. The general outline of the examination work is presented below.

THE EXAMINATION PLAN OF THE USE IN PHYSICS 2019

Designation of the level of difficulty of the task: B - basic, P - increased, C - high.

Verifiable content items and activities

Difficulty level of the task

Maximum score for completing the task

Exercise 1. Uniform straight motion, uniformly accelerated rectilinear motion, circular motion
Task 2. Newton's laws, law universal gravitation, Hooke's law, friction force
Task 3. The law of conservation of momentum, kinetic and potential energies, work and power of force, the law of conservation of mechanical energy
Task 4. Equilibrium condition of a rigid body, Pascal's law, Archimedes force, mathematical and spring pendulums, mechanical waves, sound
Task 5. Mechanics (explanation of phenomena; interpretation of the results of experiments presented in the form of tables or graphs)
Task 6. Mechanics (change in physical quantities in processes)
Task 7. Mechanics (matching between schedules and physical quantities; between physical quantities and formulas)
Task 8. The relationship between pressure and average kinetic energy, absolute temperature, relationship between temperature and average kinetic energy, Mendeleev - Clapeyron equation, isoprocesses
Task 9. Work in thermodynamics, the first law of thermodynamics, heat engine efficiency
Task 10. Relative air humidity, amount of heat
Task 11. MKT, thermodynamics (explanation of phenomena; interpretation of experimental results presented in the form of tables or graphs)
Task 12. MKT, thermodynamics (change in physical quantities in processes; establishing correspondence between graphs and physical quantities, between physical quantities and formulas)
Task 13. Principle of superposition of electric fields, magnetic field of a conductor with current, Ampere force, Lorentz force, Lenz rule (determination of direction)
Task 14. Conservation law electric charge, Coulomb's law, capacitor, current strength, Ohm's law for a section of a circuit, series and parallel connection of conductors, work and power of current, Joule-Lenz law
Task 15. Flux of the vector of magnetic induction, Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, inductance, energy magnetic field coils with current, oscillatory circuit, laws of reflection and refraction of light, path of rays in a lens
Task 16. Electrodynamics (explanation of phenomena; interpretation of the results of experiments presented in the form of tables or graphs)
Task 17. Electrodynamics (change in physical quantities in processes)
Task 18. Electrodynamics and the basics of SRT (establishing correspondence between graphs and physical quantities, between physical quantities and formulas)
Task 19. Planetary model atom. Nucleon model of the nucleus. Nuclear reactions.
Task 20. Photons, line spectra, the law of radioactive decay
Task 21. Quantum physics (change in physical quantities in processes; establishing correspondence between graphs and physical quantities, between physical quantities and formulas)
Task 22.
Task 23. Mechanics - the quantum physics(methods of scientific knowledge)
Task 24. Elements of astrophysics: solar system, stars, galaxies
Task 25. Mechanics, molecular physics (design problem)
Task 26. Molecular physics, electrodynamics (design problem)
Task 27.
Task 28 (C1). Mechanics - Quantum Physics (Qualitative Problem)
Task 29 (C2). Mechanics (design problem)
Task 30 (C3). Molecular physics (computational problem)
Task 31 (C4). Electrodynamics (design problem)
Task 32 (C5). Electrodynamics, quantum physics (computational problem)

Correspondence between the minimum primary scores and the minimum test scores of 2019. Order on amendments to Appendix No. 1 to the order of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science.

88 90 92 94 96 98 100

THRESHOLD SCORE
The order of Rosobrnadzor established the minimum number of points, confirming the mastering by the participants of examinations of the basic general education programs of secondary (complete) general education in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standard of secondary (complete) general education. PHYSICS THRESHOLD: 11 primary points (36 test points).

EXAMINATION FORM
You can download high quality forms by following the link.

WHAT YOU CAN TAKE WITH YOURSELF TO THE EXAM

On the physics exam, it is allowed to use the ruler for plotting graphs, optical and electrical circuits; non-programmable calculator that provides arithmetic calculations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, root extraction) and calculation trigonometric functions(sin, cos, tg, ctg, arcsin, arcos, arctg), and also does not function as a means of communication, database storage and does not have access to data networks (including the Internet). ...