Expoding the scam points in Russian. Unified State Exam. Translation of EGE points to assess

Evaluation criteria

Exam in Russian language in grade 11 (exam)

For true execution all tasksexamination work can be obtained as much as possible 55 primary points.

For true execution eVERY tasks parts 1 (except tasks 7, 15 and 24) a graduate receives 1 point. For an incorrect answer or its absence, 0 points are exhibited.

For execution tasks 7. May be exhibited from 0 to 5 points. For each right specified digit corresponding to the number from the list, the examiner receives 1 point (5 points: no errors; 4 points: 1 error is allowed; 3 points: 2 errors are allowed; 2 points: 2 digits are correct; 1 point: correctly indicated Only one digit; 0 points: completely incorrect answer, i.e. incorrect sequence of numbers or its absence). The order of recording numbers in the response is important.

For execution tasks 15. May be exhibited from 0 to 2 points. For each correctly specified digit corresponding to the response number, the examiner gets 1 point. If you are correctly given 2 digits, the examiner receives 2 points.

For execution tasks 24. May be exhibited from 0 to 4 points. For each correctly specified digit corresponding to the term of the term from the list, the examiner receives 1 point (4 points: no errors; 3 points: 1 error is allowed; 2 points: 2 errors are allowed; 1 point: only one digit is true; 0 points: 0 points Completely incorrect answer, i.e.neser sequence of numbers or its absence. The order of recording numbers in the response is important.

Maximum number of pointswhich can get a student who correctly fulfilled the task part 2, amounts 23 points.

Criteria for appreciation of the task with an expanded answer (essay)

Criteria for evaluation of response to task C1

Point

Composition of writings

K1.

Formulation of the problems of the source text

Examined (in one form or another in any of the parts of the writing) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text.

 Actual errors associated with understanding and wording problem

The examiner could not correctly formulate none of the problems of the source text.

K2.

Commentary on the formulated problem of source text

The problem-formulated problem commented on the support for the source text. Actual errors associated with understanding the problem of the source text,  no comments

The problem formulated is not commented,or in the comments, more than 1 actual error associated with the understanding of the source text are admitted or the other problem is commented, non-examined problem,or as a comment, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given,  or as comments cited a large fragment of source text

K3.

The examiner correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text at the commented problem.
Actual errors associated with the understanding of the position of the author of the source text, no

K4.

Argument examined one's own opinion on the problem

The examiner expressed my opinion on the problem formulated by him, supplied by the author of the text (agreeing or not agreeing with the position of the author), argued it (led not less than 2 arguments, one of which was taken from artistic, journalistic or scientific literature)

The examiner expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, supplied by the author of the text (agreeing or not agreeing with the position of the author), argued it (led at least 2 arguments, relying on knowledge, life experience), orbrought only 1 argument from artistic, journalistic or scientific literature

The examiner expressed my opinion on the problem formulated by him, supplied by the author of the text (agreeing or not agreeing with the position of the author), argued it (led 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life experience

The examiner formulated my opinion on the problem with the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the author's position), but did not lead arguments, orthe view of the examiner is only formally stated (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), orthe opinion of the examiner is not at all reflected in the work.

II.

Speech decoration of writings

K5.

Semantic integrity, speech connectivity and sequence of presentation

The work of the examiner is characterized by semantic integrity, speech connectivity and a sequence of presentation:
- Logic errors are missing, the sequence of the presentation is not violated;
- There are no violations of paragraphic membership.

The work of the examined is characterized by semantic integrity, connectedness and sequence of presentation, but1 logical error is allowed and / orthere is 1 violation of the paragraphic session of the text

In the work of the examiner, the communicative intention is visible,  but more than 1 logical error is admitted,  and / or there are 2 cases of violation of the paragraph of text

K6.

Speech accuracy and expressiveness

The work of the examined is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, a variety of grammatical system of speech.
* The highest score according to this criterion examines only if the highest score is obtained by the criterion K10

The work of the examined is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, butmixed monotony of the grammatical system of speech, orthe work of the examined is characterized by a variety of grammatical system of speech, butthere are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought

The work of the examined is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical system of speech

III

Literacy

K7.

Compliance with spelling norms

orphographic errors No (or 1 non-bug)

not more than 2 errors

3-4 errors are admitted

advanced more than 4 errors

K8.

Compliance with punctuation norms

punctuation errors no (or 1 non-bug)

1-3 errors are admitted

4-5 errors are allowed

more than 5 errors are allowed

K9.

Compliance with language norms

there are no grammatical errors

1-2 errors are allowed

admitted more than 2 errors

K10

Compliance with speech norms

not more than 1 speech error

2-3 errors are admitted

more than 3 errors are admitted

K11.

Compliance with ethical norms

ethical errors in work are missing

ethical errors (1 or more) are allowed

K12.

Compliance with factual accuracy in the background material

actual errors in the background material are missing

actual errors (1 or more) are admitted in the background material

Maximum number of points for all written work (K1-K12)

When estimating literacy (K7-K10), the volume of essays should be taken into account. The estimation rate specified in the table is designed to work with the volume of 150-300 words.

If there is less than 70 words in writing, then such work is not counted and estimated by zero points, the task is considered unfulfilled.

When evaluating an essay from 70 to 150 words number of permissible errors Four species (K7-K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria is set in the following cases:

K7 - no orphographic errors (or 1 non-bugs are allowed);

K8 - punctuation errors No (or 1 non-bug).

1 score for these criteria is set in the following cases:

K7 - not more than 2 errors are allowed;

K8 - 1-3 errors are allowed;

K9 - no grammatical errors;

K10 - no more than 1 speech error is allowed.

Highest mark According to criteria K7-K12 For work volume from 70 to 150 words not put on.

If the essay is a retold or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the check (K1-K12) is estimated by zero points.

If in the work that is a rewrote or retold source text contains fragments of the text of the examiner, then the number of words that belongs to examine is taken into account when checking. Work written without support for read text (not in this text) is not evaluated.

GOOD LUCK TO YOU,

GRADUATES!

2018-2019 academic year will become graduation for many Russian schoolchildren who are already concerned about the successful passage of a single state exam and successful admission to a good university.

We will tell you how to check examinations on different subjects, how the translation scales of the USE points are in assessments and which innovations can be expected in 2019.

Principles of evaluation of the work of the exam 2019

Over the past few years, the EGE system has undergone significant changes over a number of items and was shown to the optimal (according to the organizers) a format that allows to fully appreciate the volume of the graduate's knowledge according to a specific subject.

In 2018-2019, cardinal changes are not foreseen and can be said with confidence that the same principles will be applied to assess the works of graduates as in 2017-2018:

automated blank check;
attracting experts to verify tasks with deployed responses.

How does the computer evaluate?

The first part of the examination work implies a short response to the questions set, which the participant of the USE must be in a special answer form.

Important! Before starting work, be sure to read the rules for filling the form, since incorrectly executed work will not work automated verification.

Challenge the result of computer check is quite difficult. If the work was not counted due to the fault of the participant, incorrectly filling out the form, the result is equal to unsatisfactory.

How do experts evaluate?

In many subjects, in addition to the test part there are tasks to which you need to give a full detailed answer. Since it is impossible to automate the verification process of such answers, experts are attracted to the inspection - experienced teachers who have a lot of work experience.

Checking the exam Teacher does not know (and even with a great desire can not learn), whose work lies in front of him and in which city (region) it was written. The check is carried out on the basis of uniform assessment criteria designed specifically for each subject. Every work is checked by two experts. If the opinion of specialists coincides, the assessment is set in the form, if independent appraisers differ in opinion, then the third expert is attracted to the inspection, whose opinion will be decisive.

That is why it is important to write it picking up and carefully so that it does not arise the ambiguous interpretation of words and phrases.

Primary and test points

According to the results of the verification, the participant of the EGE is charged a certain number of primary points, which are after transferred to text (points for the entire test). In various subjects, a different maximum of primary points is envisaged, depending on the number of tasks. But after bringing the result on the relevant table, the EGE participant receives a final test point, which is the official result of its graduation tests (maximum 100 points).

So, to pass the exam sufficiently to dial the minimum primary score threshold:

	Minimum points
	primary	test
Russian language
Mathematics (profile)


Computer science
Social science
Foreign languages

Biology
Geography
Literature

Focusing on these figures you can accurately understand that the exam is delivered. But what evaluation? In this you will help the online scale of 2018, designed specifically for the translation of the primary scam points into test, which will also be relevant for the results of 2019. Convenient calculator can be found on the website 4EGE.ru.

Official announcement

Graduates always worries the question - how quickly you can find out which result is obtained when surrender and what will be the scale of the scale in 2019 for the translation of the scores scored to traditional estimates.

Soothe students are often taken by the teacher, working aside immediately after the exam task of the USE tickets and assessing the quality of the work of work with pupils and the sum of the recruited primary points. Official results must be waiting for 8-14 days, according to the established regulation of the EEG-2019. On average, the organizers approve such verification charts:

3 days to check the work;
5-6 days for information processing at the federal level;
1 working day for approval of the results of GEK;
3 days for posting results on the network and transfer data to educational institutions.

In case of unforeseen situations and technical problems, these deadlines may be revised.

You can find out the owl score:

directly at your school;
on the portal check.edu.ru;
on the site gosuslugi.ru.

Balley translation to evaluation

Since 2009, the results of the EG are not contributed to the graduate certificate. Therefore, today there is no official state system for transferring the result of the EGE to an assessment on a school 5-tibal scale. As part of the introductory campaign, it is always summed up and account for the test score specified on the exam. But, many students are still interested to know how they passed the exam - by 3 or 4, on 4 or on 5. For this, there is a special table in which conformity is written in detail for each of the 100 points each of the items.



Russian language
Mathematics


Computer science
Social science
Foreign languages

Biology
Geography
Literature

It is uncomfortable to use such a table. It is much easier to learn how you passed the Russian language, mathematics or history, using an online calculator 4EGE.ru, which also built a translation scales of the EGE points, up to date for graduates of 2019.

Having received the result of the EGE, it is necessary to determine as soon as possible with the university, comparing its capabilities with a real competition for the specialty. Thus, the practice of past years shows that in some cases, it is difficult to get on the most sought-after directions in the metropolitan universities even with high points, because there will be no only owners of the 100-ball results of the EGE, and the winners of the largest Olympiads of the 2018-2019 school years will be competed.

When passing exam testing, students are invited to perform 24 basic tasks from the first part. They require graduates providing a brief response, which is fixed in verbal or digital form. The second part of the examination testing contains only one task. Students are invited to write an essay.

How is the translation of the scam points in the Russian language and what is the minimum and maximum number of their quantity? These issues are one of the most exciting as for students of high schools and their parents and teachers. After checking the final testing, the primary score is set: from 0 to 58. For each task, a certain number is provided: from 1 to 5. The more difficult it is, the more points receive a graduate. Evaluation of the results of writing the writing is carried out differently. For him, schoolchildren can be accrued from 0 to 24 points.

Then the transfer of primary points into tests is carried out. They are indicated in the certificate of a single state examination. It is this result that is taken into account when entering universities.

How many points need to dial to talk about successful testing? It should be borne in mind that students who received a certificate cannot always claim admission to universities. It is possible to talk about the successful assimilation of the main general education program and the possibility of entering the university only if the schoolboy scored 16 primary, or 36 test points, respectively. Will be taken into account in the student rating in the list of applicants for applicants. The average passage score is at least 65-75. Graduates, planning to enter the leading universities of Moscow and other cities of our country, should take into account the fact that in this case this figure will be higher.

The translation of the USE points in the Russian language is carried out using a special scale. It should be borne in mind that the algorithm is adjusted from year to year.

Table of scam points in the Russian language

Primary score	Test score
1	3
2	5
3	8
4	10
5	12
6	15
7	17
8	20
9	22
10	24
11	26
12	28
13	30
14	32
15	34
16	36
17	38
18	39
19	40
20	41

Primary score	Test score
21	42
22	44
23	45
24	46
25	47
26	48
27	50
28	51
29	52
30	53
31	54
32	56
33	57
34	58
35	59
36	60
37	62
38	63
39	64
40	65

Below are the criteria for evaluating the composition (essay) on the exam in the Russian language for 2020. In new russian language demolism 2020 The evaluation criteria were changed K2. and K4..

For which the most points can give:

5 points - for the comment on the problem of the source text - K2
3 points - for literacy: spelling (K7) and punctuation (K8)

The argument of his own opinion on the problem - removed in 2019!

Maximumfor the writing can be obtained 24 points.

Criteria for estimating response to task 27

K1. Formulation of the problems of the source text

1 point. Examined (in one form or another in any of the parts of the writing) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text. There are no actual errors associated with understanding and wording problem.
0 points.The examiner could not correctly formulate none of the problems of the source text. * If the examiner did not formulate or formulated incorrectly (in one form or another in any of the parts of the writing), one of the problems of the source text, then such work on C1-K4 criteria is estimated 0 points

K2. Commentary on the formulated problem of source text

5 points. 2 examples-illustration From the read text, important to understand the problem. An explanation is given to 2 given examples. Detected meaningful bond between them. Actual errors associated with the understanding of the problem of the source text, in the comment not.
4 points.The problem-formulated problem commented on the support for the source text. The examiner brought no less 2 examples-illustration From the read text, important to understand the problem. An explanation is given to 2 given examples, but No sense relationship between them,
ordetected the meaningful link between examples, but An explanation is given only to one example. Actual errors related to understanding the problem of the source text in the comment
3 points.The problem-formulated problem commented on the support for the source text. The examiner brought no less 2 examples-illustration but An explanation is given only to one example, the sense relationship between the examples is not detected, or The examiner led 1 example illustration from the read text, important to understand the problem, and gave an explanation for him, orloved 2 examples-illustrationfrom the read text, important to understand the problem, but did not explain their meaning. The meaningful link between examples - illustrations is indicated.
Actual errors associated with the understanding of the problem of the source text, in the comment not.
2 points.The examiner led 2 examples-illustration From the read text, important to understand the problem, but did not explain their meaning. The sense relationship between examples is not detected.
1 point.The examiner led 1 example illustration From the read text, important to understand the problem, but did not explain its meaning.
0 points.Examples of illustrations from the read text, important for understanding the problem, are not given orthe problem commented without support for the source text, orin the comments, actual errors (one or more) associated with the understanding of the source text were admitted, orthe other problem is commented, non-examined problem, orinstead of comment, there is a simple retelling of the text, orinstead of comment, a large fragment of source text is cited.

K3.Reflection of the position of the author of the original text

1 point.The examiner correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text at the commented problem. Actual errors associated with understanding the position of the author of the original text is not.
0 points.The position of the author of the source text examined is informable, or The position of the author of the source text is not formulated.

K4 attitude to the position of the author on the problem of source text

1 point.The examiner expressed my attitude to the position of the author of the text on the problem (agreeing or disagreeing with the author) and substantiated it.
0 points.The examiner did not express my attitude to the position of the author of the text, or Reflections of the examiner do not correspond to the formulated problem, or The opinion of the examined is only formally declared (for example, "I agree / disagree with the author")

II. Speech decoration of writings

K5. Semantic integrity, speech connectivity and sequence of presentation

2 points. The work of the examined is characterized by semantic integrity, speech connectivity and sequence of presentation: - Logic errors are missing, the sequence of the presentation is not violated; - There are no violations of the paragraph of text.
1 point.The work of the examined is characterized by semantic integrity, connectedness and sequence of presentation, but 1 logical error is allowed and / or In the work there is 1 violation of the paragraph of text.
0 points.In the work of the examiner, the communicative intention is visible, but more than 1 logical error are admitted, and / or There are 2 cases of violation of the paragraph of text.

K6. Speech accuracy and expressiveness

2 points.The work of the examined is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, a variety of grammatical system of speech. * The highest score on this criterion examines only if the highest score is obtained by the K10 criterion.
1 point.The work of the examined is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but Mixed monotony of the grammatical system of speech, or The work of the examined is characterized by a variety of grammatical system of speech, but There are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought.
0 points.The work of the examined is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical system of speech.

III. Literacy

K7.Compliance with spelling norms

3 points. Orphographic errors No (or 1 non-bug error).
2 points.1-2 errors are allowed.
1 point.3-4 errors are allowed.
0 points.Advanced more than 4 errors.

K8.Compliance with punctuation norms

3 points.There are no punctuation errors (or 1 non-bug).
2 points.1-3 errors are admitted
1 point.4-5 errors are admitted.
0 points.6 and more errors are admitted.

K9. Compliance with language norms

2 points.There are no grammatical errors.
1 point.1-2 errors are allowed.
0 points.3 or more errors are admitted.

K10Compliance with speech norms

2 points.Not more than 1 speech error are allowed.
1 point.2-3 errors are allowed.
0 points.4 and more errors are admitted.

K11.Compliance with ethical norms

1 point.Ethical errors are missing.
0 points.Ethical errors (1 or more) are allowed.

K12Compliance with factual accuracy in the background material

1 point.Actual errors in the background material are absent.
0 points.Actual errors (1 or more) are admitted in the background material.

Maximum amount Points for all written work (K1-K12) - 24 points.

When estimating literacy (K7-K10), the volume of essays should be taken into account.When counting, words are taken into account both independent and service parts of speech. Any sequence of words written without a space is calculated (for example, "nevertheless" is one word, "Still" - two words). The initials with the surname are considered in one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" is one word). Any other characters, in particular figures, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words.
The estimation rate specified in the table is designed to work with the volume of 150-300 words. If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten examined text of the reference book 26 and / or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
If in writings less than 70 wordsthen such work is not counted and 0 points are estimated, the task is considered unfulfilled.
When evaluating an essay of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four species (K7-K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria is set in the following cases:

K7 - orphographic errors No (or one non-bugs is allowed);
K8 - no punctuation errors (or one non-bug is allowed).

1 score for these criteria is set in the following cases:

K7 - not more than two errors are allowed;
K8 - one or three errors are admitted;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error is allowed.

The highest score according to the criteria K7-K12 for the work of the volume from 70 to 150 words is not put.

If an essay is a retold or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the inspection (K1-K12) is estimated 0 points.
If in the work that is a rewrote or retold source text contains fragments of the text of the examiner, then the number of words that belongs to examine is taken into account when checking. Work written without support for read text (not in this text) is not evaluated.

Decide in the Russian language

Each graduate perfectly understands that for successful admission to the specialty of interest, it is necessary to qualitatively prepare for the EEG-2018 and to gain the highest possible points.

Minimum scam points for 2018

Depending on the specialty, which receives a graduate, the profile subject may be mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, foreign language, or another subject, which is based on the basis of training. Each year, the university's admission committee sets the threshold value of this score. If the student cannot provide a certificate with a passing minimum, its documents are not considered even if it has high points for other subjects.

russian language - minimum 34 points;

basic mathematics - minimum of 27 points;

profile mathematics - minimum 27 points;

social science - minimum 42 points;

physics - minimum 36 points;

literature is minimum 32 points;

history, minimum 29 points;

chemistry - minimum 36 points;

all-Russian exam in English (French, German, Spanish) language - minimum 22 points;

biology - minimum 36 points;

informatics - minimum 40 points;

geography - minimum 40 points.

Points for the transfer of points to the EHE-2018 evaluation

Russian language:

0-35 points correspond to the estimate 2,
36-57 points - score 3,
58-71 points - estimate 4,
72 points and higher - score 5;

Mathematics (profile level):

0-26 points - score 2,
27-46 points - score 3,
47-64 points - score 4,
65 and above points - rating 5;

Mathematics (base level):

0-6 points - rating 2,
7-11 points - score 3,
12-16 points - estimate 4,
17-20 - score 5;

Social science:

0-41 points - score 2,
42-54 points - score 3,
55-66 points - estimate 4,
67 and above points - estimate 5;

Biology:

0-35 points - Rating 2,
36-54 points - score 3,
55-71 points - score 4,
72 and above points - score 5;

0-31 points - score 2,
32-49 points - score 3,
50-67 points - estimate 4,
68 and above points - rating 5;

0-35 points - Rating 2,
36-52 points - score 3,
53-67 points - Evaluation 4,
68 and above points - rating 5;

0-26 points correspond to the estimate 2,
36-55 points - score 3,
56-72 points - estimate 4,
73 points and higher - score 5;

Literature:

0-31 points - score 2,
32-54 points - score 3,
55-66 points - estimate 4,
67 and above points - estimate 5;

Computer science:

0-39 points - score 2,
40-55 points - score 3,
57-72 points - estimate 4,
73 and above points - rating 5.

Geography:

0-36 points - Rating 2,
37-50 points - score 3,
51-66 points - estimate 4,
67 and above points - estimate 5;

Foreign languages:

0-21 points - score 2,
22-58 points - score 3,
59-83 points - score 4,
84 and above points - score 5;

Is it possible to recall the exam in order to improve the result?

The exam on the choice can be rented only the next year. But the mandatory objects are Russian or mathematics - it is allowed to reckon this year, but only if the participant has not overcome the minimum threshold according to one of these items. For example, if one of the exams was commissioned successfully, and on the second it is not recruited the desired minimum. If the graduate did not pass both mandatory exam, they will be able to recall in September. It happens that the student came to the exam, began to write work, but for some reason the reasons could not complete it. In this case, the result is considered canceled, with the examination of the exam in a reserve day.

If the student does not agree with the scores, where and to whom to go?

Within two working days after the official day of the announcement of the results, it is necessary to appeal there, where the application was written for the exam. This is usually a school. She will immediately give an appeal to a conflict commission. In each region there are such commissions, and everyone has the right to prove their right.

Recently was held in Nalchik, the share of "100 points for victory", when last year's stufflets told the current graduates, as successfully passing the exam. There was one girl who had 97 points on the exam, but she was sure that he had even higher evaluation. The work was revised, she was put 100 points.

Recently, the number of applications to conflict commissions has decreased. Those guys have ceased to appeal to appeal, on maybe: what if the examiners will add points? Now all statements are essentially, as a rule, from those who are very confident in their forces and knowledge.

Primary score	Test score
1	3
2	5
3	8
4	10
5	12
6	15
7	17
8	20
9	22
10	24
11	26
12	28
13	30
14	32
15	34
16	36
17	38
18	39
19	40
20	41

Primary score	Test score
21	42
22	44
23	45
24	46
25	47
26	48
27	50
28	51
29	52
30	53
31	54
32	56
33	57
34	58
35	59
36	60
37	62
38	63
39	64
40	65

Primary score	Test score
1	3
2	5
3	8
4	10
5	12
6	15
7	17
8	20
9	22
10	24
11	26
12	28
13	30
14	32
15	34
16	36
17	38
18	39
19	40
20	41

Primary score	Test score
21	42
22	44
23	45
24	46
25	47
26	48
27	50
28	51
29	52
30	53
31	54
32	56
33	57
34	58
35	59
36	60
37	62
38	63
39	64
40	65

Primary score	Test score
1	3
2	5
3	8
4	10
5	12
6	15
7	17
8	20
9	22
10	24
11	26
12	28
13	30
14	32
15	34
16	36
17	38
18	39
19	40
20	41

Primary score	Test score
21	42
22	44
23	45
24	46
25	47
26	48
27	50
28	51
29	52
30	53
31	54
32	56
33	57
34	58
35	59
36	60
37	62
38	63
39	64
40	65